October 8, 2013

Big majority of Mormons (including women) oppose women in priesthood

FT_Mormons_WomanLeaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (also known as the Mormon Church)  reaffirmed their position that women should not be eligible for the priesthood this past weekend at the semiannual General Conference in Salt Lake City.

The Mormon priesthood is different than the priesthood in some other faiths. All worthy male members of the church are eligible to begin priesthood service when they reach age 12, and men may hold various offices in the priesthood – such as deacon, teacher, priest, elder or high priest – at different stages in their lives.

A group of women reportedly attempted to gain entry to last weekend’s all-male priesthood session, but they were not allowed in. “Most church members would see such efforts as divisive,” LDS Church spokeswoman Ruth Todd said in a statement, according to The Salt Lake Tribune.

A 2011 Pew Research Center survey found that most U.S. Mormons oppose the idea of female membership in the priesthood. Asked whether women who are dedicated members of the LDS Church should be ordained to the priesthood, 87% of U.S. Mormons said no, while 11% said yes.

Mormon women are somewhat more likely than men to oppose the idea of women in the priesthood. Fully nine-in-ten Mormon women (90%) say women should not be ordained, compared with 84% of Mormon men.

The survey measured the religious commitment of respondents based on questions about the importance of religion, frequency of prayer and frequency of worship attendance. The belief that women should be ordained to the priesthood is held least among those who have the highest levels of religious commitment; just 4% of Mormons in that group say women should be ordained, while 95% say they should not. Even among Mormons with lower levels of religious commitment, however, nearly seven-in-ten (69%) say women should not be eligible for the priesthood.

Topics: Mormons and Mormonism, Religious Beliefs and Practices

  1. is Editor at the Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project.

Leave a Comment


All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.


  1. Isaac4 weeks ago

    Pew Survey Question suggestion for LDS women:

    1. If offered the priesthood by the prophet, would you refuse it?
    2. If church leaders said women could be ordained would you support it?
    3. Would you welcome the ordination of women, if the general authorities approved it?
    etc. etc. and any similar type of questions like the above list of questions would have been more insightful and honest.

    I would guess that 90% or more of the LDS women would have answered a resounding YES. The Pew Survey question “Should women who are dedicated members of the LDS Church be ordained to the priesthood?” is not taking into account that most “faithful” LDS women and men would have no problem with women being ordained IF the prophet declared the change. Members of the LDS Church recognize that the prophet is the only one to reveal from God any change for something this significant.

    One very significant difference between the “dedicated” women in the LDS Church and women who belong to other religions is that leaders who serve in priesthood positions of the LDS Church do NOT receive pay or monetary gain for services rendered. Dedicated women in the LDS Church are already busy enough without becoming bishops, stake presidents, or any position of priesthood leadership without pay.

  2. Hazel Morrison4 months ago

    I believe, in our pre-mortal life, we have the opportunity to decide which gender we are. I believe we are told/taught what is expected of us. At that time we have “free agency” to wait to be male or female. Our choice in the pre-mortal determines our gender therefore determines our role in life. I may be wrong, but I feel this way. I am very happy to be a female in this life. I look forward to being the female in the next.

  3. CTC4 months ago

    It is a crazy question.

    God chooses who is conferred the priesthood and the doctrine of the church. If President Monson and the presiding leaders of the church, received a revelation stating that women should be “ordained” to the priesthood, I would say “that’s great, when do we start.” But it is not my choice, and I don’t need to question that.

  4. debra4 months ago

    In answer to the “Black Race” who could not receive the priesthood, this question cannot be answered simply, without a study of the past and a forsaking of past practises. I suggest a deep study on the subject, I suggest that as one seeks, studies and ponders on such things, answers will come as there is a season for all things to be fulfilled. Do we need evidence of God’s unmatched power, do the scriptures not testify of his greatness, remember that when the day comes, the scripture testifies, that “Every Knee” shall bow.

  5. debra4 months ago

    As an Lds women, I sustain the leader’s of God’s church, I know this is God’s church and do not seek to council God but to take council from him. I know that I have access to the blessing and power of the priesthood and stand as an equal in God’s church, where the teachings have blessed my life and the lives of my children, as converts to this church we will continue to do so, come what may.

  6. Danny R. Wright4 months ago


  7. flowerheimer5 months ago

    Hello. I apologize if this post (or the gist of it) comes up twice. I just thought I had already posted, but don’t see it yet.
    Anyway, the gist of what I was saying is the following:
    I am an LDS woman, and I don’t want to be ordained to the priesthood. And this is in spite of the fact that I tend to call myself a “feminist” in at least some sense of the word. I have a few reasons for not wanting to be ordained to the Priesthood. One reason is the simple fact that I just don’t need more things to do. I don’t need to oversee what other people are doing in their callings at church, because I am pretty proud of myself when I just fulfill my own two callings, which are nursery teacher and special needs Relief Society teacher. Another reason is that I am a mother, and well, I want to actually see my daughter before she grows up. I feel it is very important for a mother to just, well, be around. I need to be there for my girl. I am busy with church, but I am grateful that I don’t have the job of going to priesthood meetings on top of all the other things I am trying to do. And just belonging to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day saints has plenty of important things for women to do! It’s not like they just sit back and do nothing, of course.
    Just as a side note: My husband passed away. But if he were still here, I would appreciate him going and serving in his Priesthood callings, and simply letting me do all the things I need to do. Also, my husband was NEVER an “I am the male; you are the female; therefore I rule” kind of guy. He didn’t have an ounce of sexism in his whole body. In fact, when I married him, he actually considered taking my surname. And this was HIS suggestion, not mine.
    Anyway, I think men NEED to serve, just like women, and children need to. I think some men have the tendency to say “Oh, my wife will do it if I don’t get around to it.” But if they are the only ones who are ordained, they just can’t delegate to their wives or the Relief Society some of the things that they simply need to get up and go do and serve. Men NEED the chance to serve. Women, in general, tend to do this innately. But men have a unique chance with the priesthood, as it is something they just CAN’T delegate. Of course, they can choose not to, but, there are many things that they just basically need to go out and do. And it blesses themselves, and blesses so many other people. And it really is from God. Not to be abused. But something THEY need to do.

    1. Bird4 months ago

      Thank you! You said how I feel.

    2. Shari Dodson4 months ago

      AMEN and AMEN!!

    3. Rosa Bermudez4 months ago


    4. Anja Steffensen4 months ago

      Thank you! I couldn’t say it better. These women do not believe in the priesthood really. They simply have not understood what the priesthood is. Priesthood was restored through revelation. If it was intended that women should have it the way these women want, it would be revealed to the prophet through the Priesthood not through a member who doesn’t have the authority to do so.

  8. D-I-Y-mom7 months ago

    As a mormon woman I felt the need to write a post to adequately share my feelings on this subject:

  9. Paul M10 months ago

    “A group of women reportedly attempted to gain entry to last weekend’s all-male priesthood session”

    They should be excommunicated immediately. Why? Because they don’t actually believe their religion. They don’t actually believe that there’s any sort of God-given truth to it – they think it’s merely some sort of social club. A lifestyle choice.

    They don’t genuinely believe a word of it. They are not mormons.

    1. Sam7 months ago

      Wow! What an egregious use of the No True Scotsman fallacy!


  10. gramval1 year ago


    1. Eric7 months ago

      I think Catherine Wessinger of Loyola University (New Orleans) said it well:

      The word “cult” represents just as much prejudice and antagonism as racial slurs or derogatory words for women and homosexuals. She has argued that it is important for people to become aware of the bigotry conveyed by the word, drawing attention to the way it dehumanises the group’s members and their children. Labeling a group as subhuman, she says, becomes a justification for violence against it.

    2. Exil4 months ago

      Yes, yes it is. As a former member that grew up indoctrination since birth I can affirm this.

  11. Bruce1 year ago

    The “if-then” conundrum for Ordain Women is this. “If” the priesthood (aka – the power of God) is worth having, “then” it must truly be from God. “If” it is truly from God, “then” the prophet who holds the keys of that same priesthood must be a true prophet. “If” he is a true prophet, “then” he communicates directly with and is obedient to God. “If” he communicates with and is obedient to God, “then” the priesthood is being administered according to God’s will.

    Ordain Women are left then to argue that the prophet is simply not asking the right questions, but that wrongly suggests that God does not reveal His will unless asked.

    The divisiveness of the question Ordain Women are really asking may be framed akin to the question about paying tribute to Caesar posed to Jesus 2000 years ago: “Tell us therefore, what thinkest thou? Is it lawful to ordain women to the priesthood, or not?”

    The question was designed to entrap the respondent, which is analogous to what Ordain Women are doing. They have presupposed God’s will and thus suggest that the prophet is only a true prophet if he confirms what they have presupposed.

    That’s not how it works.

    1. Chad7 months ago

      Funny. That’s exactly what happened with blacks and the priesthood. The prophets were denying the priesthood to otherwise worthy church members based only on the color of their skin, all the while asserting that it was god’s will. Turns out they were wrong. Why do you think they aren’t also wrong when they deny the priesthood to otherwise worthy church members based only on their gender? (When you answer, take into account that after the announcement they used 2 Nephi 26:33 as evidence that it was god’s will that blacks have the priesthood.)

    2. Sam7 months ago

      “Ordain Women are left then to argue that the prophet is simply not asking the right questions, but that wrongly suggests that God does not reveal His will unless asked.”

      Except for all those times where that’s exactly how revelation was received? Like…the Word of Wisdom? The first vision? The 10 commandments? Practically everything Nephi did? Every single member that prays for a confirmation that the Book of Mormon is true? It’s very rare that the Lord will just tell you what to do. 9 times out of 10 he expects you to ask.

  12. Alison1 year ago

    Given this survey was taken two years ago, before the foundation of Ordain Women, or the development of a “Mofem movement”, it would be really interesting to get another survey taken and see if those events had changed the percentages at all.

  13. Sasha1 year ago

    Thank you Pew for sharing some substantiated evidence. Numbers are so much better than a random news article speculating and throwing around assumptions. This seems to be another example of the media taking a pot-stirring issue and blowing it way out of proportion to get more clicks. The state of the media is truly disappointing.

    It’s also important to point out that Mormons don’t depend on voting for their beliefs.

  14. Kate Kelly1 year ago

    For true, believing Mormons statistics are not relevant to this situation. We believe that God is at the head of the church and that it is guided by our leaders through revelation. The revelatory process is not dependent on achieving a majority vote. Thank goodness!

    1. PmH1 year ago

      And yet, you don’t seem to want to listen to what those same leaders have told you.

    2. Brian1 year ago

      Try telling that to OW.

  15. Debra1 year ago

    The wording of this question would explain why Mormons appear opposed. If Pew had asked, “If the Mormon prophet announced that women would be ordained to the priesthood in the LDS Church, would you be opposed?” I bet the numbers would skyrocket.

    And that is what the Ordain Women movement is working for.

    @SCW, Joseph Smith also announced that Emma Smith didn’t need to be ordained in that meeting because she had been previously ordained.

    Also, women were allowed to do more than heal. They participated in blessings and conducted disciplinary courts for other women (a current priesthood duty).

    1. Brooks Wilson1 year ago

      @Debra. I suspect that you are right about the importance of the wording of the survey questions and I would be interested to see survey results for your question. A neutral question would be difficult to write. The inverse relationship between religious commitment and support for women’s ordination can also probably be interpreted as support for the status quo as well. Less committed women are more likely to question the inspiration of leaders and support equality in the Church as they do politically. That is not to imply that committed women cannot or do not support the ordination of women.

      Could you provide the reference that you referred about Emma having been previously ordained?

      1. Chad7 months ago

        From “Women and Authority,” Chapter 17: “Mormon Women Have Had the Priesthood Since 1843,” and essay by D. Michael Quinn:

        As newly sustained president of the Anointed Quorum, Joseph administered the initiatory ordinances and priesthood endowment to his wife in an upper room of the Nauvoo Mansion. The record of “Meetings of the Anointed Quorum” shows that at this same meeting, Joseph and Emma also became the first couple to receive the “second anointing” or “fullness of the priesthood.” By this ceremony they were each “anointed & ordained to the highest & holiest order of the priesthood.” Later church historians in Utah deleted Emma’s name from the 1843 description of the prophet’s “second Anointing of the Highest & Holiest order.”

  16. Linda Le1 year ago

    The LDS faith believes that God our Father gave the gift of the Priesthood to worthy men. Most LDS women don’t contest if women should be “eligible” for the priesthood because we understand our role in Heavenly Father’s plan for us eternally. The term eligible is misleading. It sounds as if some earthly person somewhere could flip a switch and suddenly make women “eligible” for the priesthood. Someone declaring LDS women “eligible” for the priesthood would act against God’s eternal plan for all of us that was laid out from before the foundation of the world. Worthy men are able to bear the priesthood as God’s power to act on this earth and a far larger number of women bear the divine ability to form, like God creates and forms, new life inside their bodies. Both roles are unique and need each other. Neither role is complete without the other. Neither role is diminished by the other role’s greatness. LDS women generally choose the majesty and the burden in their role just as they understand the majesty and the burden that priesthood holders bear.

  17. Samuel Lamanite1 year ago

    Women in Utah want the Priesthood why Joseph Smith gave it originally and later denied by Brigham Young. Most important Ida Smith talks about the Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon something the LDS Church does not want you to find out or READ or you will be excommunicated.

    1. SCW1 year ago

      @Samuel Lamanite

      There is no evidence (as in absolutely no evidence) that Joseph Smith or anybody ever ordained a woman to the Priesthood. Some women try to make it sound like he did with his comment that women would be a “kingdom of priests”. But to suggest that Mormon women were ever ordained goes beyond the evidence.

      I’m not saying women will never receive the Priesthood. I’m just saying let’s stick to the facts. Women did heal through the laying on hands. But this was always understood to be done through faith.

      1. Edward Bailey1 year ago

        What are the rights, authority, and keys exercised by women who have been endowed as queens and priestesses after they walk outside the temple?

        1. Rita1 year ago

          Like the brethren, we are only anointed “to become such”. Actually gaining that status depends upon our faithfulness, on both sides of the aisle.
          That said, I am a “mother in Zion”. I exercise the stewardship given my by the Father in acting as an equal partner with my husband, blessing my children by raising them in truth and righteousness, acting as the “hands of God” in my community through the service that I render, and preaching the gospel through teaching and leading, standing as a witness of Christ, inviting others to find the joy I have found, and using my gifts and talents to heal and comfort. What man could do more than I am called to do, even with his authority through ordination? When I lay my hands upon my children to heal them, I use the judgment and skill given me by the Spirit, and my own study and learning, to provide medicines, healing foods and the loving touch of a daughter of God. I have just as much authority to call on the power of God in my stewardship as any man in his, but I am called to a different work, one that I agreed to before I came here to earth. I wouldn’t have it any other way.

          1. Amanda Hosler1 year ago

            As an endowed dedicated member I agree with you fully. We (as Women)are endowed (or given the gift of the priesthood) to make decisions in a righteous manor as equal partners with our husbands over our house holds for the blessing of our children and those around us . Women don’t need the keys of the priesthood to pray for some one ,give encouragement or help heal others though massage for example . Women are given some gifts the brethren don’t have -doesn’t mean they’re inferior or superior just different in the gifts God gave them to build His kingdom, and all good gifts come from God . Women don’t need the Key’s of the priesthood to act as a disciple of Christ .I find that the women of the church asking to be ordained like men are either not fully committed to following The teachings of Jesus Christ and the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ and or they are leaning towards apostatizing in some manner. If they looked at the women who are using the priesthood they were given like Rita does they would realize they were already ordained to the work of God in His holy temples . Besides , Men need responsibility of the priesthood to act in God’s name to help them become more willing to serve their fellow men women and children to help them become more like Christ .I personally think that Women don’t need the extra responsibility . they would have to leave all the things they have going on to go bless, teach and preside .It would be too much responsibility to ask upon the women of the church. I am personally content trying full fill my current responsibilities. I don’t feel cheated of the priesthood or equal rights .

          2. Edward Bailey11 months ago

            RIta, Thank you for sharing your beautiful thoughts. Could I share just a few points? In the initiatory washing and anointing there are distinct differences and our Heavenly parents clearly treasure daughters in a special way. Emma was a “mother in zion” in mortality – although tragic with the death of her son Alvin, 15 years before receiving an anointing as a “queen and priestess”. Why the additional gifts and blessings? From 1 Nephi 21:23, becoming a “nursing father or mother” does not require giving birth to biological children as not all are blessed in this manner. Concerning keys – there were keys conferred upon the relief society sisters. See the Nauvoo relief society minutes book – page 34, 35, 37 and 49. Thank you for sharing how you have taken it upon yourself, “to lay . . hands upon [your] children to heal them.”

      2. Edward Bailey11 months ago

        28 Sept. 1843, Emma was anointed a “queen and priestess” and became the first female member of the holy order of God, or quorum of the anointed.