For the 33% of Americans who do not currently have broadband service at home, financial concerns – the monthly cost of a broadband subscription most prominently, but also the cost of a computer – loom large as barriers to non-adoption. At the same time, for many non-broadband users who own a smartphone, the functionality of these mobile devices makes traditional broadband a lesser priority. Still, other non-adopters indicate that they have options for online service outside their home, or that suitable broadband service is hard to get in their area.
Most non-users point toward multiple reasons for why they do not have high-speed service at home. The typical (median) non-broadband user cites two reasons for not subscribing to home broadband service, while 43% list three reasons or more.
In some form, cost is the chief reason that non-adopters cite when permitted to identify more than one reason they do not have a home high-speed subscription. Overall, 66% of non-adopters point toward either the monthly service fee or the cost of the computer as a barrier to adoption.
When presented with a follow-up question asking them to identify the most important reason they do not have a home broadband subscription, non-adopters are again more likely to cite the monthly cost of broadband service than any other reason. Smartphone users differ in that the capability of their smartphone rivals the monthly cost of broadband as the main reason they go without service.
Price sensitivity – the sense that the monthly fee is too much – is a larger concern for non-adopters who are more likely to recognize the importance of a home high-speed connection. As noted earlier, two-thirds (65%) of non-adopters in 2015 say that being without broadband at home is a major disadvantage of some sort – an increase from 48% who said this in 2010 across the same five subject areas. Among the 2015 group of non-adopters who see lacking broadband as a major disadvantage, 38% cite price as their main barrier to adoption. This compares with just 22% who cite the monthly service fee as their primary barrier among non-users who do not see home broadband service as particularly critical.
The inverse relationship is worth emphasis. Many more non-adopters in 2015 say that being without broadband is a major hindrance in some way than said so in 2010. As this view of the importance of a home high-speed subscription has grown, so has the sense that the monthly fee is the sticking point in having home service.
A majority of non-broadband users have never had broadband at home, and just one-quarter of them are interested in getting it in the future
Some 36% of non-broadband users say they had high-speed service at home in the past, while 59% indicate that they have never had a home broadband subscription. And just one-quarter (25%) of non-broadband users say they are interested in having broadband internet service at home in the future, while 70% are not interested.
Those who say they had high-speed internet service at home in the past tend to be relatively young. More than half (56%) of those who once had service are under age 50, compared with 34% of those who never had broadband. It is also notable that parents with children who are minors (under the age of 18) at home are more likely to have had broadband in the past than non-parents; among those who had service in the past, 30% are parents with minor children, while 19% of those who never had service are parents of minor children.
Nearly half of those who do not have broadband at home – or 15% of all Americans – are in a “hard-to-reach” category that suggests they may not be broadband subscribers any time soon
The survey asked non-broadband users whether they ever had service at home and whether they have interest in subscribing in the future. Those who answered in the negative for both questions – that is, those who have never had broadband in the past and do not have an interest in subscribing to service in the future – come to 46% of all non-adopters. They fall into the “hard-to-reach” category of non-adopters, not only because of their stated preferences and past behavior. They also, demographically, contrast sharply with other non-adopters on characteristics that align with a low likelihood of home broadband adoption. The “hard-to-reach” are:
- less educated: Just 8% of the “hard-to-reach” have a college degree, compared with 14% of other non-adopters;
- older: 39% of the “hard-to-reach” are age 65 or older, compared with 19% for remaining non-adopters;
- less connected to technology: Just 44% of the “hard-to-reach” are internet users, and just 29% have smartphones; the figures for other non-adopters are 72% and 53% respectively.
The other notable characteristic of the “hard-to-reach” is that they are less likely to cite the monthly access fee as their most important reason for not having service.
Barriers to smartphone adoption: Cost is cited most frequently as the main reason people do not have a smartphone, though many say they simply do not need one
One-third of Americans do not have a smartphone. These are the reasons they provide when asked to identify the main reason they do not have this type of device:
- 36% indicate that smartphones are too expensive (either the data plan or the device itself);
- 29% say they do not need one or are happy with their current phone;
- 15% are uninterested in getting one or have not gotten around to it;
- 9% say it is too complicated.
The reasons cited are very similar to what non-smartphone users said in 2012, when 45% of adults had a smartphone.