September 16, 2014

Public is sharply divided in views of Americans in poverty

While the nation’s poverty rate has dipped for the first time since 2006, the actual number of poor people (45.3 million) was not statistically different from the previous year, according to the figures released today by the Census Bureau. Poverty is an issue that deeply divides the American public when it comes to how much of a role government should play in alleviating the problems of the poor.

 Public is sharply divided in views of Americans in poverty When asked which view comes closer to their own, roughly half of the public (51%) says the “government today can’t afford to do much more to help the needy,” while 43% say “the government should do more to help needy Americans, even if it means going deeper into debt,” according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted earlier this year.

There are significant divisions on this question by income. Among those with annual family incomes of $50,000 or higher, a majority (59%) say the government can’t do more to help the needy, while 36% say the government should do more. There is no statistical difference on this measure between the highest income Americans (those making at least $150,000 a year) and those who earn between $50,000 and $74,999.

By contrast, among those with annual family incomes of less than $20,000,  a majority (57%) say the government should do more to help the needy while 37% say the government can’t do more; Those earning between $20,000 and $50,000 are roughly divided in their opinions on this question

The public is similarly divided over the impact government aid has on the poor: 44% say poor people “have it easy because they can get government benefits without doing anything in return” while 47% say “poor people have hard lives because government benefits don’t go far enough to help them live decently.”

Again, responses differ by income. About four-in-ten (37%) of those with incomes of $50,000 or more say that poor people have hard lives; among those with incomes under $20,000, about two-thirds (65%) say this.

On these two questions – whether the government should offer more help to the needy, and whether the aid goes far enough – Americans also are split along partisan lines.

For example, 73% of Republicans say the government can’t afford to do much more to help the needy, while just 32% of Democrats say this.  Among the most affluent Americans (those with family incomes above $150,000), party may trump income when it comes to views about the poor.

High-income Democrats (those with family incomes of $150,000 or more) are among the most sympathetic to the poor. About three-in-four (73%) say the poor have hard lives, a share that is higher than among Democrats of lower incomes. By contrast, strong majorities of wealthy and middle income Republicans (those with family incomes of $50,000 or higher) say that the poor have it easy, with more than seven-in-ten holding that view.

Lower income Republicans (with incomes under $20,000) have a distinctly different view on this issue: only 45% say the poor have it easy, while fully 50% say the poor have hard lives because government benefits don’t go far enough.

Topics: Economics and Personal Finances, Population Trends, Poverty

  1. Photo of Jens Manuel Krogstad

    is a writer/editor focusing on Hispanics, immigration and demographics at Pew Research Center.

  2. Photo of Kim Parker

    is director of social trends research at Pew Research Center.

4 Comments

  1. Amar Rao8 months ago

    I hope you also run polls asking “Should the government initiate more wars, even if it means going deeper into debt?”

  2. Nathen Becker2 years ago

    How does a sovereign currency issuing nation like the USA go into debt in its own currency when it spends in dollars? Pose the correct questions and then publish the results.
    Thank you.

  3. Pyrite2 years ago

    I am curious about what is considered “poor” in the United States versus what would be considered “poor” in developing or third world countries.

    1. seagull2 years ago

      If the US (or E.U.) standard were used, probably 99% of the world’s population would be considered extremely poor. What this study shows more than anything else is how far removed the well off is from the everyday reality of the poor in the USA. There is no doubt that those upper income people are predisposed to despise those they think are simply poor because of the lack of personal efforts.
      When asked if they would be willing to trade places with the desperately poor, for only a month, not one would be willing to do so. It is easy to point fingers, and make arrogant assumptions about others if you don’t have to experience their existence.

      Inequality is simply an accepted fact of life under the unfettered capitalist system that is now enveloping the world. How long inequality will be tolerated is yet to be determined.