This roundup of findings shows public views about science-related issues and the role of science in Polish society. The findings come from a Pew Research Center survey conducted across 20 publics in Europe, the Asia-Pacific, Russia, the U.S., Canada and Brazil from October 2019 to March 2020.
[chapter title=”Ratings of medical treatments, scientific achievements and STEM education in Poland” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/STEM_icon.png”]
Majorities in most of the 20 publics surveyed saw their medical treatments in a favorable light on the eve of the global pandemic. Medical treatments were often seen more favorably than achievements in other areas.
Across the 20 publics, a median of 59% say their medical treatments are at least above average. In Poland, only 13% think their country’s medical treatments are the best in the world or above average, one of the lowest shares across the 2o survey publics. Nearly half of Polish adults (48%) think their medical treatments are below average.
Four-in-ten Polish adults say their scientific achievements are above average or the best in the world; 32% say this about their technological achievements. When it comes to STEM education, 40% in Poland say their country’s university STEM education is at least above average, and 36% say this about STEM education at the primary and secondary school levels.
Majorities in all publics agree that being a world leader in scientific achievement is at least somewhat important, but the share who view this as very important varies by public. A 20-public median of 51% place the highest level of importance on being a science world leader. In Poland, only 35% of people say being a world leader in scientific achievements is very important.
Overall, there is broad agreement among these 20 publics that government investment in scientific research is worthwhile. A median of 82% say government investments in scientific research aimed at advancing knowledge are usually worthwhile for society over time. In Poland, 73% of people say this.
[chapter title=”Views on artificial intelligence, food science and childhood vaccines in Poland” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/AI_icon.png”]
Majorities in most publics see their government’s space exploration program as a good thing for society. Across the 20 publics, a median of 72% say their government’s space exploration program has mostly been a good thing for society. Polish adults are the least likely across the 20 surveyed publics to have positive views of their space program. Only 48% of Polish adults say the European Space Agency’s space exploration program has been good for society.
Public views on artificial intelligence (AI) and using robots to automate jobs are more varied from public to public. A median of 53% say the development of AI, or computer systems designed to imitate human behaviors, has mostly been a good thing for society, while 33% say it has been a bad thing. The Center survey also finds that publics offer mixed views about the use of robots to automate jobs. Across the 20 publics, a median of 48% say such automation has mostly been a good thing, while 42% say it has been a bad thing.
In Poland, some 51% say workplace automation through robotics has been good for society, while 21% say it has been a bad thing. Opinions about the effect of AI are slightly less positive: 38% say it has been good for society, while 28% say it has been bad for society.
Across most of the publics surveyed, views about the safety of fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides, food and drinks with artificial preservatives and genetically modified foods tilt far more negative than positive. About half think produce grown with pesticides (median of 53%), foods made with artificial preservatives (53%) or genetically modified foods (48%) are unsafe. In Poland, people are skeptical. Only 12% say fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides are safe, while a broad majority (70%) thinks they are unsafe and 15% say they don’t know enough about this issue to say. Most say food and drinks with artificial preservatives (77%) or genetically modified foods (67%) are unsafe to eat.
When it comes to childhood vaccines such as the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, a median of 61% says the preventive health benefits of such vaccines are high, and a median of 55% thinks there is no or only a low risk of side effects. About two-thirds in Poland (65%) say the preventive health benefits from the MMR vaccine are high; 58% rate the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine as low or none.
[chapter title=”Views on climate and the environment in Poland” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/Climate_icon.png”]
Majorities across all 20 survey publics would prioritize protecting the environment even if it causes slower economic growth. A median of 71% would prioritize environmental protection. In Poland too, 71% think protecting the environment should be given priority, even if it causes slower economic growth and some loss of jobs. A far smaller share (21%) thinks creating jobs should be the top priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent.
Public concern about global climate change has gone up over the past few years in many publics surveyed by the Center.
Majorities in all 20 publics say they are seeing at least some effects of climate change where they live. A median of 70% say they are experiencing a great deal or some effects of climate change where they live. In Poland, 73% say climate change is affecting where they live a great deal (34%) or some (39%).
A 20-public median of 58% say their national government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change. A majority of 67% in Poland say their government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change, while 18% say the government is doing about the right amount and just 6% say it is doing too much.
Find out more
Read the full report online.
All surveys were conducted with nationally representative samples of adults ages 18 and older. Here is the survey methodology used in each public.