This roundup of findings shows public views about science-related issues and the role of science in Canadian society. The findings come from a Pew Research Center survey conducted across 20 publics in Europe, the Asia-Pacific, Russia, the U.S., Canada and Brazil from October 2019 to March 2020.
[chapter title=”Ratings of medical treatments, scientific achievements and STEM education in Canada” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/STEM_icon.png”]
Majorities in most of the 20 publics surveyed saw their medical treatments in a favorable light on the eve of the global pandemic. Medical treatments were often seen more favorably than achievements in other areas.
Across the 20 publics, a median of 59% say their medical treatments are at least above average. In Canada, the same share (59%) think their country’s medical treatments are the best in the world or above average. Only 13% of Canadians think their medical treatments are below average.
About half of Canadians say their country’s university STEM education is at least above average (49%). A smaller share thinks their primary and secondary STEM education is the best in the world or above average (36%). About four-in-ten say Canada’s scientific achievements are at least above average (42%), and a similar share says Canada’s technological achievements are at least above average (40%).
Majorities in all publics agree that being a world leader in scientific achievement is at least somewhat important, but the share who view this as very important varies by public. A 20-public median of 51% place the highest level of importance on being a science world leader. In Canada, 52% of people say being a world leader in scientific achievements is very important.
Overall, there is broad agreement among these 20 publics that government investment in scientific research is worthwhile. A median of 82% say government investments in scientific research aimed at advancing knowledge are usually worthwhile for society over time. In Canada, 83% say this.
[chapter title=”Views on artificial intelligence, food science and childhood vaccines in Canada” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/AI_icon.png”]
Majorities in most publics see their government’s space exploration program as a good thing for society. Across the 20 publics, a median of 72% say their government’s space exploration program has mostly been a good thing for society. In Canada, about three-quarters (77%) say the Canadian Space Agency’s space exploration program has been good for society.
Public views on artificial intelligence (AI) and using robots to automate jobs are more varied from public to public. A median of 53% say the development of AI, or computer systems designed to imitate human behaviors, has mostly been a good thing for society, while 33% say it has been a bad thing. The Center survey also finds that publics offer mixed views about the use of robots to automate jobs. Across the 20 publics, a median of 48% say such automation has mostly been a good thing, while 42% say it has been a bad thing.
In Canada, opinion is split on the use of AI and robots to automate jobs. Overall, 46% say AI has been good for society, while 43% say it has been bad. And 47% say the effect of workplace automation has been a good thing for society, compared with 44% who say it has been a bad thing.
Across most of the publics surveyed, views about the safety of fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides, food and drinks with artificial preservatives and genetically modified foods tilt far more negative than positive. About half think produce grown with pesticides (median of 53%), foods made with artificial preservatives (53%) or genetically modified foods (48%) are unsafe. In Canada, 47% say fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides are unsafe, compared with fewer (24%) who say they are safe; 27% say they don’t know enough about this issue to say. Larger shares also say food and drinks with artificial preservatives and genetically modified foods are unsafe than safe.
When it comes to childhood vaccines such as the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, a median of 61% say the preventive health benefits of such vaccines are high, and a median of 55% think there is no or only a low risk of side effects. Canada is among the survey publics most likely to rate the preventive health benefits as high and to rate the risk of side effects as low. Three-quarters of Canadian adults say the preventive health benefits from the MMR vaccine are high; about seven-in-ten (68%) rate the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine as low or none.
[chapter title=”Views on climate and the environment in Canada” icon_url=”https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/09/Climate_icon.png”]
Majorities across all 20 survey publics would prioritize protecting the environment, even if it causes slower economic growth. A median of 71% would prioritize environmental protection. In Canada, a similar share (69%) thinks protecting the environment should be given priority, even if it causes slower economic growth and some loss of jobs. A far smaller share (25%) thinks creating jobs should be the top priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent.
Public concern about global climate change has gone up over the past few years in many publics surveyed by the Center.
Majorities in all 20 publics say they are seeing at least some effects of climate change where they live. A median of 70% say they are experiencing a great deal or some effects of climate change where they live. In Canada, 64% say climate change is affecting where they live a great deal (22%) or some (42%).
A 20-public median of 58% say their national government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change. A majority of adults in Canada say their government is doing too little (60%) to reduce the effects of climate change, while 22% say the government is doing about the right amount, and 14% say it is doing too much.
Find out more
Read the full report online.
All surveys were conducted with nationally representative samples of adults ages 18 and older. Here is the survey methodology used in each public.