June 26, 2014

New political typology data show islands of agreement amid sea of polarization

Given how polarized American politics and society are these days, it’s easy to think of Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, as entrenched and embittered enemies locked in endless battle. But sometimes politics does indeed make strange bedfellows, and data from the Pew Research Center’s latest political typology report show some surprising areas of agreement between otherwise opposing groups.

Who are the political typology groups?

Steadfast Conservatives: Generally critical of government, especially social safety net programs, but also critical of big business and immigrants. Most are very socially conservative.

Business Conservatives: Overall, critical of government regulation and social-welfare spending, but not of big business. For the most part, moderate to liberal on social issues, with positive views toward immigrants.

Young Outsiders: Tend to be distrustful of government programs and fiscally conservative, but very liberal on social issues and not very religious.

Hard-Pressed Skeptics: Generally distrustful of government, except for social safety net spending. On average, low-income, anti-immigrant compared with other groups.

Next Generation Left: Generally positive feelings about government, but less so for social programs. Tend to be business-oriented and individualistic.

Faith and Family Left: By and large, highly religious, socially conservative, but strongly support social safety net and government action more broadly.

Solid Liberals: Overall, highly supportive of social programs, immigrants and government generally; very skeptical of business and markets. Consistently liberal on social issues, from homosexuality to environmental protection.

Take, for example, the question of whether the U.S. government should collect telecommunications data as part of its anti-terrorism efforts. Opposition to such practices is highest at both ends of the political spectrum: 69% of Steadfast Conservatives, 61% of Business Conservatives and 58% of Solid Liberals say they disapprove of government data collection.

strange_bedfellows (1)When it comes to immigration, Steadfast Conservatives and Hard-Pressed Skeptics — two groups which otherwise have little in common — share similarly negative views: 79% of the Hard-Pressed group and 73% of the Steadfast group call immigrants a burden on American society, while 81% of Steadfasts and 72% of the Hard-Pressed say newcomers threaten “traditional American customs and values.” Those two groups also express the most support for a national effort to deport all illegal immigrants: 42% of Steadfasts and 31% of the Hard-Pressed favor such a policy. 

On several hot-button issues, the Faith and Family Left more resembles the two conservative groupings than their usual allies on the left. For example, 54% of the Faith and Family Left say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases; the only other groups with majorities saying that were Business Conservatives (59%) and Steadfast Conservatives (70%). By almost identical percentages, the same three groups were the only ones with majorities opposing the legalization of marijuana. The Faith and Family Left also joined with the conservative groups in saying that military force was the best way to defeat global terrorism.

When it comes to race and discrimination, though, it’s the Next Generation Left that looks more like the right-leaning groups. Two-thirds (67%) of Next-Gens say the U.S. has made sufficient changes to give blacks equal rights with whites, aligning them with Business Conservatives (83%), Steadfast Conservatives (81%) and Young Outsiders (70%). Next-Gens also are the Democratic-oriented group least likely (19%) to say racial discrimination is the main thing holding back black people.

Conversely, about two-thirds (68%) of the GOP-leaning Young Outsiders say stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the economic cost, putting them in the same camp as Solid Liberals (93%), the Next Generation Left (81%) and the Faith and Family Left (65%).

Support for and opposition to same-sex marriage is all over the typological map. Strong majorities of Democratic-oriented Solid Liberals (89%) and the Next Generation Left (78%) support it, as do 68% of Young Outsiders. The two groups with majority opposition to same-sex marriage are Steadfast Conservatives (84%) and the Faith and Family Left (55%). (Opinion within the other two groups, Business Conservatives and Hard-Pressed Skeptics, is roughly divided.)

There are, we suppose, two ways to look at all this ideological cross-pollination, depending on whether you’re a glass-half-full or glass-half-empty sort of person. You can see it as evidence that there are areas where groups could work together across partisan lines to resolve seemingly intractable issues, or that both parties’ coalitions are so internally fractured that finding workable solutions to those issues is well-nigh impossible.

Topics: Political Typology

  1. Photo of Drew DeSilver

    is a senior writer at Pew Research Center.

Leave a Comment

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

2 Comments

  1. slk2 years ago

    bipartisanship was easier when democrats were still capitalists!!! the new democrat, or better termed liberal socialist, is a speaking socialist, who lives as a capitalist!!! just look at many of your beloved liberal socialist hollywood idols, who make millions making violent gun movies (which soo many of you love), and do ad campaigns for the hated “big corporations”!!! one thing, why do soo many of the hated big corporations donate so heavily to liberal socialists??? think about that!!!

    Reply
    1. Sanfewd G.2 years ago

      The Hollywood idols who make the violent gun movies know that they are just movies, make believe, like the Three Stooges were pretty violent also. The “liberals” who enjoy those movies understand that they are escapes from reality. The gun nuts also enjoy those films believe that life is supposed to be that way. What I don’t understand is why the liberal celebrities (Barbra Streisand, Rob Reiner, etc.) are not considered to be worthy of their cause because they’re just Hollywood. But those stars who embrace conservatism (Charlton Heston, Sonny Bono, etc.) are accepted as authorities. Today the most famous Hollywood star, Ronald Reagan, would be too liberal for the Tea Partiers!

      Reply