Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Congress has long struggled to pass spending bills on time

Large chunks of the federal government, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to the National Archives, are shut down because there’s no money to keep them open, and federal workers are facing possible mass layoffs. The new federal fiscal year began on Oct. 1, but Congress didn’t pass any of the dozen annual appropriations bills it’s supposed to enact. Nor did lawmakers pass a stopgap spending law to buy themselves more time.


Congress rarely passes all spending bills on time
% of stand-alone appropriations legislation enacted on or before Oct. 1 of each fiscal year
Chart
Note: Although each federal fiscal year ends on Sept. 30, bills enacted by or on Oct. 1 are considered to be “on time.”
Source: Pew Research Center analysis of legislative data from the Congressional Research Service.
PEW RESEARCH CENTER


Congress rarely passes all spending bills on time
% of stand-alone appropriations legislation enacted on or before Oct. 1 of each fiscal year
Fiscal yearOn-time percentage
1977100%
197869%
197938%
198023%
19818%
19828%
19838%
198431%
198531%
19860%
19870%
19880%
1989100%
19908%
19910%
199223%
19938%
199415%
1995100%
19960%
1997100%
19988%
19998%
200031%
200115%
20020%
20030%
200423%
20058%
200618%
20079%
20080%
200925%
20108%
20110%
20120%
20130%
20140%
20150%
20160%
20178%
20180%
201942%
20200%
20210%
20220%
20230%
20240%
20250%
Note: Although each federal fiscal year ends on Sept. 30, bills enacted by or on Oct. 1 are considered to be “on time.”
Source: Pew Research Center analysis of legislative data from the Congressional Research Service.
PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Congress’ chronic inability to follow its own appropriations process is hardly new. In the nearly five decades that the current system for budgeting and spending tax dollars has been in place, Congress has passed all its required appropriations measures on time only four times: fiscal 1977 (the first full fiscal year under the current system), 1989, 1995 and 1997. And even those last three times, Congress was late in passing the budget blueprint that, in theory at least, precedes the actual spending bills.

In short, the typical appropriations process bears little resemblance to the orderly one laid out in the 1974 Congressional Budget Act. Instead, it’s a hodgepodge of late budget blueprints, temporary spending measures to keep the government running, and omnibus appropriations packages that sprawl over hundreds of pages.

It wasn’t supposed to be that way.

How we did this

With the federal government once again in a government shutdown, we decided to update our historical look at the federal budgeting and appropriations process – and Congress’ difficulties in adhering to its own rules.

For this analysis, we used data from congress.gov, an official online repository of legislation and legislative data. We identified every appropriations bill enacted since 1976, when the new process laid out in the 1974 Congressional Budget Act (CBA), began to take effect. We coded each of these laws as a regular, continuing or supplemental appropriation. We also noted which appropriations area or areas each measure covered, as well as the date it became law, so we could compare it against the deadlines laid out in the CBA.

Similarly, we identified all budget resolutions agreed to since 1975 and when they passed relative to the CBA deadlines.

For explanations of how the budget and appropriations process is supposed to work, we relied primarily on a series of reports by the Congressional Research Service, including its “Introduction to the Federal Budget Process.” We used historical spending data published by the Office of Management and Budget to calculate mandatory and discretionary spending shares.

First step: The budget resolution

Once the president submits a budget proposal – which is supposed to happen (but often doesn’t) by the first Monday in February – the House and Senate start work on a budget resolution. This is a concurrent resolution, agreed to by both chambers but not presented to the president. While it doesn’t have the force of law, the budget resolution is meant to serve as an overall revenue and spending plan for the coming fiscal year. It guides lawmakers as they assemble the detailed appropriations bills.

Timetable of the congressional budget process (in law, if not always in practice)

First Monday in February: President submits proposed budget.  

Feb. 15: Congressional Budget Office submits report on economic and fiscal outlook to the House and Senate budget committees.  

Six weeks after president submits budget: Other House and Senate committees submit their views and estimates to the budget committees.

April 1: Senate Budget Committee reports concurrent resolution on the budget.  

April 15: House and Senate agree to a concurrent resolution on the budget.  

May 15: Annual appropriations bills may be considered in the House.  

June 10: House Appropriations Committee reports its last annual appropriations bill.  

June 15: Congress completes action on reconciliation legislation.  

June 30: House completes action on all annual appropriations bills.  

Oct. 1: Fiscal year begins; all annual appropriations bills enacted by this date.  

But even this initial step has often proven problematic. Although the Congressional Budget Act sets an April 15 target date for the budget resolution, Congress has seldom met that deadline. The budget resolution has been adopted late – or not at all – in 45 of the past 51 fiscal years, including fiscal 2026.

This year’s process was especially unusual. Congress adopted a budget resolution in April – more than halfway into the 2025 fiscal year, and a month after passing a full-year funding bill. Doing so was a necessary first step toward enacting the massive bill that included much of President Donald Trump’s domestic policy agenda.

Next step: The appropriations bills

After a budget resolution is adopted, Congress is supposed to pass a series of separate bills funding various federal agencies and activities. For more than a decade, the number of spending bills has stood at 12, one for each pair of subcommittees on the House and Senate appropriations committees. The deadline for passing these bills is Oct. 1, when the new fiscal year starts.

But that hasn’t actually happened since 1996, when the final three appropriations bills for fiscal 1997 (one of them a six-bill omnibus package) became law on Sept. 30, the day before the new fiscal year began. Since then, Congress has never passed more than five of its 12 regular appropriations bills on time. Usually, it’s done considerably less than that: In 13 of the past 15 fiscal years – including this year – lawmakers have not passed a single spending bill by Oct. 1.

Instead, Congress regularly buys itself extra time by relying on continuing resolutions (CRs). Continuing resolutions typically extend funding levels from the prior fiscal year, but only for existing programs. They’ve lasted as little as one day and as long as the rest of the fiscal year – a “full-year CR” in budget-speak.

Continuing resolutions keep the government functioning but permit the appropriations process to drag out for weeks or months past its theoretical deadline. Since fiscal 1998, there have been an average of 117 days – almost four months – between the start of each fiscal year and that year’s final spending bill becoming law. In one extreme case, the final spending bill for fiscal 2017 didn’t become law until May 2017, more than seven months into the fiscal year.

Rather than pass individual spending bills as envisioned in the 1974 budget law, Congress has taken to resolving its annual spending disputes by using omnibus bills or full-year continuing resolutions, which are different ways of bundling multiple appropriations measures into a single, giant law.

The first such omnibus measure was passed in 1950 as a one-off experiment, and the tactic was used a couple of times in the mid-1980s. However, omnibus bills have become more the norm than the exception recently: In 12 of the past 15 fiscal years, all of the regular appropriations bills were combined into after-deadline package deals, most recently in March of this year.

Different types of federal spending


Appropriations bills make up less than a third of all federal spending
% of total federal expenditures, by fiscal year and category
Chart
Note: “Discretionary” refers to federal expenditures that are controlled via annual appropriations laws. “Mandatory” refers to expenditures provided for by permanent laws, occurring independently of the appropriations process. “Net interest” refers to interest payments on federal debt securities, less interest received by federal trust funds and other investment income.
Source: Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget.
PEW RESEARCH CENTER


Appropriations bills make up less than a third of all federal spending
% of total federal expenditures, by fiscal year and category
Fiscal yearMandatoryNet interestDiscretionary
197744.5%7.3%48.2%
197844.6%7.7%47.7%
197943.9%8.5%47.6%
198044.4%8.9%46.8%
198144.5%10.1%45.4%
198244.9%11.4%43.7%
198345.2%11.1%43.7%
198442.4%13.0%44.5%
198542.4%13.7%43.9%
198642.0%13.7%44.3%
198742.0%13.8%44.2%
198842.1%14.3%43.6%
198942.5%14.8%42.7%
199045.3%14.7%40.0%
199145.0%14.7%40.3%
199246.9%14.4%38.6%
199347.6%14.1%38.3%
199449.1%13.9%37.0%
199548.7%15.3%35.9%
199650.4%15.5%34.1%
199750.6%15.2%34.2%
199852.0%14.6%33.4%
199952.9%13.5%33.6%
200053.2%12.5%34.4%
200154.1%11.1%34.8%
200255.0%8.5%36.5%
200354.7%7.1%38.2%
200454.0%7.0%39.0%
200553.4%7.4%39.2%
200653.2%8.5%38.3%
200753.1%8.7%38.2%
200853.5%8.5%38.1%
200959.5%5.3%35.2%
201055.4%5.7%39.0%
201156.2%6.4%37.4%
201257.6%6.2%36.2%
201358.8%6.4%34.8%
201459.8%6.5%33.6%
201562.2%6.0%31.7%
201663.0%6.2%30.8%
201763.3%6.6%30.1%
201861.4%7.9%30.7%
201961.5%8.4%30.1%
202069.9%5.3%24.8%
202170.8%5.2%24.0%
202265.9%7.6%26.5%
202361.3%10.7%28.0%
202460.2%13.0%26.8%
Note: “Discretionary” refers to federal expenditures that are controlled via annual appropriations laws. “Mandatory” refers to expenditures provided for by permanent laws, occurring independently of the appropriations process. “Net interest” refers to interest payments on federal debt securities, less interest received by federal trust funds and other investment income.
Source: Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget.
PEW RESEARCH CENTER

For all the energy that goes into the annual appropriations process and all the attention it attracts, it covers less than a third of all federal spending.

Most federal spending – including for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment compensation and other entitlement programs – is mandated by the statutes governing those programs. Such mandatory spending topped $4 trillion in fiscal 2024, or 60.2% of all federal outlays.

The appropriations process, by contrast, covers discretionary spending – everything from the military and space programs to disaster relief and farm price supports. In fiscal 2024, discretionary spending totaled about $1.8 trillion, or 26.8% of total outlays. (An additional 13% represents net interest paid on the national debt.)

How common are government shutdowns?

Including the current one, there have been six shutdowns since 1995, excluding a nine-hour funding gap (the interval between the expiration of one continuing resolution and the enactment of another) in the overnight hours of Feb. 8-9, 2018. Prior to this year, the most recent shutdown lasted 35 days, from Dec. 22, 2018, to Jan. 25, 2019.

The impact of a shutdown depends on how long it lasts and which parts of the government are forced to close their doors. During the 2018-19 standoff, for instance, only about 300,000 of an estimated 2.1 million federal workers were furloughed, largely because five of the 12 spending bills – those covering the Defense, Education, Health and Human Services departments and other major parts of the federal government – had already become law. Still, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the shutdown shaved about $3 billion, or 0.02%, off that year’s gross domestic product.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published on Jan. 16, 2018.