July 20, 2015

Latin America’s middle class grows, but in some regions more than others

As a whole, Latin America enjoyed solid economic growth in the first decade of this century, with a fall in poverty, a decrease in income inequality and a rise of its middle class. But in many respects, it was a tale of two Americas, with South America and Mexico seeing more of these gains than Central America and the Caribbean.

A Middle-Income Population Emerges in South America and MexicoFrom 2001 to 2011, South America was one of three areas in the world (along with China and Eastern Europe) that significantly expanded its middle-income population, according to a new Pew Research Center report. Driven by an abundant supply of commodities for export (oil, copper, iron, soybeans, beef, etc.) and a surge in commodity prices worldwide, many South American economies prospered from global trade and from the steady demand of resources in an increasingly industrialized China.

South America’s middle-income population grew 11 percentage points, from 16% of the region’s total population in 2001 to 27% in 2011, and the share of people who were poor dropped 10 points in the same time frame, from 17% to 7%.

By contrast, the economic status of people in Central America and the Caribbean went mostly unchanged from 2001 to 2011. The middle-income share of the population grew only modestly, from 19% to 21%, while the share that is poor declined by just 3 percentage points.

Meanwhile, Latin America overall saw its income gap narrow over time. From 2000 to 2013, the incomes of poorer households grew at a higher rate than incomes of richer households, according to the World Bank.

From 2000-13, Income Growth Was Highest Among Latin America's Poorest

While economic growth was the most important factor in both reducing poverty and raising people into the middle class (accounting for 74% of middle-class gains from 1995 to 2010, according to one study), income redistribution policies and the decline of income inequality also helped expand the middle-income population, accounting for the remaining 26% of middle-class gains in those 15 years.

The decline in inequality in Latin America was spurred in part by social programs designed to aid the poor, through investments in health, education and other sectors. Conditional Cash Transfer programs, for example – like Bolsa Familia in Brazil or Oportunidades in Mexico – provided cash assistance to the poor if they met certain conditions, such as sending their kids to school.

After Boom, Latin American Economies Stall as Commodity Prices DropBut the economic narrative in Latin America has shifted in recent years. Progress in reducing inequality stalled from 2010 to 2013, based on the latest available data, and overall growth slowed as commodity prices dropped and economic momentum waned.

In its April 2015 report “Northern Spring, Southern Chills,” the International Monetary Fund predicted that growth in Latin America will decline for the fifth straight year. The weakness is concentrated in South American countries, which are much more dependent on commodity exports – and are more affected by the drop in prices and by China’s slowdown – than the rest of the region.

Prospects are brighter in Central American nations as well as Mexico, according to the IMF. These countries are likely to experience steadier growth moving forward, partly due to their closer economic ties with the U.S. – through trade, remittances and tourism – as the U.S. continues its recovery from the Great Recession.

Topics: Income Inequality, Latin America, Mexico, Middle Class, Poverty, World Economies

  1. is an associate digital producer at Pew Research Center.

5 Comments

  1. Viviana Patricia Cafferata11 months ago

    La clase media de América Latina crece, pero en algunas regiones más que otros con respecto a esta nota no crecio la clase media nuestra afamada presidenta está pagando subsidios a 14 millones de personas y mucha gente no está en clase media si estas estadísticas se las comunica nuestro gobierno ellos ocultan hasta la inflación del indec y no toman conciencia de que hay más de 12 millones de personas en villas si en villas.. No hay credibilidad económica ella solo se lleva bien con los paises comunistas … Infórmense sino hagan su propia estadística. La mitad de la población gana $ 5000 y menos…

  2. Cynthia Curran11 months ago

    This is great about Mexico and Central America. In fact in 10 years less Donald Trumps.

  3. Packard Day11 months ago

    As an investor, middling Chile would get two thumbs up. Leading Argentina, however, would get a very loud “stay away” signal. This is because it is never financially prudent to invest one’s own money into any country that does not have a history for respecting personal property rights (notably: Never to be confused with human rights) and the rule of law. Sadly, Argentina’s sorry economic past in this regard is just too painfully clear.

    1. Patrick Martin11 months ago

      Argentina’s history of a strong middle class is still present, even after many economic disasters. Let’s see what happens after elections, 2016 will be an interesting year, possibly the one that we’ve been waiting for making an investment in the cultural latin capital of the world.

      1. marjane529 months ago

        the latin cultural capital of the world is Rome,