July 31, 2014

Congress continues its streak of passing few significant laws

CongressProductivity_July2014Congress this week scrambled to finish several pieces of business, from increasing aid to Israel to addressing the child-migrant crisis and patching the Highway Trust Fund, before leaving Washington for its scheduled August recess. But being out of town may not noticeably affect Congress’ legislative productivity.

As of Wednesday the current Congress had enacted 142 laws, the fewest of any Congress in the past two decades over an equivalent timespan. And only 108 of those enactments were substantive pieces of legislation, under our deliberately broad criteria (no post-office renamings, anniversary commemorations or other purely ceremonial laws). That’s two fewer than the previous Congress — itself not generally considered a model of productivity — had managed by this point in 2012. (As The Washington Post recently pointed out, Congress has a long history of dithering and squabbling rather than legislating during the dog days of summer.)

Still, it’s not as though nothing has been accomplished. Besides the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act, the Huna Tlingit Traditional Gull Egg Use Act and a measure “to specify the size of the precious-metal blanks that will be used in the production of the National Baseball Hall of Fame commemorative coins,” here are some of the more significant laws passed so far by the current Congress:

  • Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act — extending the law’s provisions to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals;
  • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act — consolidates and updates federal aid to state and local job-training and employment programs;
  • Agricultural Act — the latest rewrite of the nation’s farm-subsidy and nutrition-assistance programs;
  • Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act — ties interest rates on federal direct student loans to the 10-year Treasury yield;
  • Drug Quality and Security Act — gives the FDA greater authority to regulate compounding pharmacies, which make custom versions of drugs;
  • Digital Accountability and Transparency Act — makes data on federal spending more accessible.

What’s the reason for the low legislative activity? President Obama and the Democrats who control the Senate blame Republicans for wasting time on measures that have no chance of becoming law, while House Republicans accuse Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of deliberately sitting on House-passed bills for political gain.

Members of Congress tend to act like harried undergraduates, leaving their hardest assignments till the end of the term and then finishing with a blizzard of activity. Among the past seven Congresses, between 39% and 59% of all the substantive laws they passed came in the last five months of their respective two-year terms; the average was 49%. So politics aside, recent history suggests that there’s still time for major legislation to emerge from the 113th Congress.

Topics: Congress

  1. Photo of Drew DeSilver

    is a Senior Writer at the Pew Research Center.

Leave a Comment

Or

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

6 Comments

  1. Carlos Gonzalez1 month ago

    For the last six years the republican party have been non-productive and very antagonistic towards President Obama -HOW COME?

    Reply
  2. rhard Gruenwald2 months ago

    They have been busy tryng to repeal Obamacare 50 times, no wonder they need a 5 week break. You’d think that after 40 or so tries they’d get the message. I guess they have, filing suit and perhaps impeachment next. What a sorry bunch! We pay them for this?

    Reply
  3. Fred Beloit2 months ago

    “Child migrant crisis”? Don’t tell me there is a crisis of American children leaving the U.S. because Congress has passed fewer laws (always a good thing because those laws almost always cost taxpayers big money).

    Oh wait, you mean the illegal immigrant invasion. I see now. “Words, words, words.” Hamlet, as I recall.

    Reply
  4. Jason Tweed2 months ago

    Yesterday Congress voted to sue the President for misuse of Executive Orders. Yet, clearly they have no interest in governing themselves. Furthermore, of the 108 bills that passed Congress, even fewer were able to get through the Senate. I applaud Pres. Obama for doing his job in spite of Congress, rather than being continually stymied by them. By the way, I’m fiscally conservative and Republican. I’m frustrated by my Party and the way they have purposely tried to destroy rather than build public policy. Inaction represents no one.

    Reply
    1. Fred Beloit2 months ago

      I’m a progressive Democrat as you are a conservative Republican, Jason, but I am disgusted by the President’s refusal to accept Congress as the law-making branch of government and the Presidency (himself) as the enforcement branch. I thought he was once educated as a Constitutionalist. What has happened to him?

      Reply
    2. Ralph W. Bastedo2 months ago

      The U.S. Constitution specifies that the term “Congress” refers to BOTH the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, even though some representatives may prefer to call themselves “congressmen” rather than employ the sex-neutral, constitutional term.

      However, senators and representatives are BOTH members of the U.S. Congress.

      Reply