Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Biotechnology Research Viewed With Caution Globally, but Most Support Gene Editing for Babies To Treat Disease
Most approve of research into new technologies that will help women get pregnant
Embed
Infographic Gallery
- Biotechnology Research Viewed With Caution Globally, but Most Support Gene Editing for Babies To Treat Disease
- Wide concern about research on gene editing, but most support its use for babies to treat disease
- Majorities say humans have evolved over time; Christians often less likely to express this view
- Many across global publics are wary of gene-editing research, but majorities have a favorable view if gene editing for babies is used to treat serious disease
- Younger adults are often more supportive of gene-editing research and applications
- Religiously unaffiliated adults are often positive about gene-editing research
- More religious adults less approving of gene editing to treat disease in babies
- Concerns about animal cloning research are widespread
- Men, younger people and those with more education often more supportive of animal cloning
- Most approve of research into new technologies that will help women get pregnant
- Younger, more educated adults are often more supportive of research into new technologies to help women conceive
- Majorities in most of these publics say humans and other life has evolved
- Unaffiliated are particularly likely to say humans have evolved over time
- Mixed verdicts about whether scientific and religious explanations for origins of life can be compatible
- Half or more in most publics say there is a general conflict between science and religion
- Christians less likely than the unaffiliated to say there is a general conflict between religion and science
- Christians tend to see more frequent conflict between science and their religious beliefs, Buddhists see less frequent conflict
- Support for animal cloning research tends to be higher among unaffiliated