December 3, 2013

Americans divided on whether drones make U.S. safer

A dozen years after 9/11 and the start of the war in Afghanistan, the public has mixed opinions about whether certain policies have made the U.S. safer from terrorism.

USsafety123A new survey of the general public — as part of the quadrennial America’s Place in the World survey conducted Oct. 30-Nov. 6 — asked whether government surveillance programs, the use of military drones and the war in Afghanistan have made the country safer.

Of these three issues, Americans are most in agreement when it comes to military drones that target extremists in Pakistan and elsewhere. Among those we surveyed about these anti-terrorism policies, half say the policy has made the U.S. safer. Just 14% believe drones have made the U.S. less safe and 27% say they have not made a difference.

This balance of opinion is largely consistent across partisan lines—55% of Republicans and 49% of Democrats say the program has made the country safer. Women are more skeptical than men about the impacts, with 57% of men saying this, compared with only 43% of women. (Internationally, however, the drone program is widely unpopular; at least half of the public disapproved in 31 of 39 nations surveyed this spring by the Pew Research Center.) 

Americans are more divided on the impact of the war in Afghanistan, which began in 2001 and has resulted in more than 2,100 American deaths. About three-in-ten (31%) believe the war has made the U.S. safer, while 43% say the war has not made a difference and two-in-ten (21%) say it has made the country less safe from terrorism.

Democrats and Republicans disagree about the war’s effect on the nation’s safety. Among Republicans, 41% say it has made the U.S. safer and 17% think it has made the country less safe. But Democrats are less likely to believe that the U.S. is safer because of the war (27% safer vs. 23% less safe). Independents, too, are less optimistic than Republicans about the war’s impact (28% safer, 21% less safe).

The new survey also found divided views about the U.S. government’s phone and internet surveillance programs. About as many Americans (39%) believe the surveillance has made the country safer as those who say it hasn’t made a difference (38%). In this regard, Republicans, Democrats and independents are largely in agreement.

Our surveys have shown that Americans’ views about surveillance are complicated. Several months after Edward Snowden first leaked classified information about government surveillance programs, more than half of Americans (55%) say they think the disclosures have harmed the public interest; just one-third (34%) say they have served the public interest.

But that’s not to say that the public isn’t concerned about the programs. By a margin of 44%-39%, more are concerned that the government’s anti-terrorism policies have gone too far in restricting the average person’s civil liberties than say the policies have not gone far enough to adequately protect the country.

Topics: National Security

  1. is a Research Analyst at the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.

Leave a Comment

Or

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

3 Comments

  1. Bob Turmell8 months ago

    I tend to think that the drones are a good action and certainly do no harm.

    Reply
  2. Packard Day8 months ago

    Perhaps PEW could phrase their survey question this way: “Given a choice between sending a drone or YOUR OWN son or daughter to kill the enemies of this country, which would you prefer?”

    Call me Kreskin, but I gotta haunch how the responses to that poll might go.

    Reply
    1. Doug Kelly8 months ago

      Well, Kreskin, what makes you think all the people who are killed by our drone strikes are our enemies?

      Since you have no answer for this, I’ll ask you a different question. Why is our military in Afghanistan at all? If our military wasn’t in Afghanistan, your question would be moot, wouldn’t it?

      And I know you don’t have an answer to this either. So you’re zero for two. Not too good for someone advocating drone strikes as an alternative to killing people face to face.

      Since you’ve done so poorly on the questions here, I challenge you to learn for yourself why our military is in Afghanistan being killed and maimed, and why we should even have to consider the pros and cons of these two methods of killing. It will be a grueling search for the truth. And you’ll hate the answer.

      Good luck.

      Reply