September 11, 2013

Colorado recall points to greater intensity among gun-rights supporters

A recall campaign in Colorado led by gun-control opponents succeeded Tuesday in ousting two Democratic state senators — one of them the president of the state Senate. The hard-fought election, which attracted money and attention from across the country, became a symbol of the nation’s continuing divisions over gun control versus Second Amendment rights.

GunControlThose divisions are exceptionally close, and have been since 2009, according to a series of surveys by the Pew Research Center. For many years beforehand, clear majorities of Americans had said it was more important to control gun ownership than to protect the rights of gun owners. But the gap between those two positions narrowed sharply in 2009 and has largely remained that way: In the 12 times we’ve asked the question since April of that year, only twice (in the wake of the school shootings in Newtown, Conn.) has the difference between the gun-rights and gun-control positions exceeded five percentage points. In the most recent survey, from May, 50% said gun control was more important and 48% said protecting gun rights was.

But those close divisions miss an additional dimension that often can swing elections like the one in Colorado: intensity of feeling. And there, our data show gun-rights supporters have a clear edge.

According to the May report, 41% of people who prioritize gun rights said they wouldn’t vote for a candidate with whom they disagreed on gun policy, even if they agreed with the candidate on most other issues. Only 31% of gun-control supporters said gun policy was a make-or-break voting issue for them.

Gun-control supporters also lagged gun-rights proponents in political activism, the survey found. Fully 45% of gun-rights supporters had taken at least one of four listed actions related to the issue, including 31% within the previous six months; the corresponding figures for gun-control supporters were 26% and 19%.

Intensity of feeling can be especially potent in low-turnout elections, because the most passionate supporters (or opponents) of a candidate or cause are more likely to vote. And turnout was low in both Colorado recalls: According to The Denver Post, 17,845 people voted in Senate President John Morse’s recall, 37.8% fewer than in his 2010 re-election (itself a low-turnout contest, the newspaper said). In Angela Giron’s recall election, 34,556 people voted, 23.4% fewer than in the 2010 election that sent her to the state Senate in the first place.

 

Topics: Gun Control

  1. Photo of Drew DeSilver

    is a Senior Writer at the Pew Research Center.

Leave a Comment

Or

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

3 Comments

  1. Vincent Morgillo12 months ago

    Being a person very familiar with statistics, I know that statistics can be misleading. You fail to disclose the sample size and demographics for your surveys. This brings their validity to question as to the demographics you are trying to say they represent. Local surveys and public opinion do not come close to your numbers, seems we are being deliberately misled.

    Reply
    1. Drew DeSilver12 months ago

      We do in fact disclose our survey methodology at the end of each of our reports. For example, here’s a direct link to the methodological section of the May report cited in this post:
      people-press.org/2013/05/23/broa…

      Reply
  2. Martha Freeman1 year ago

    I’ve read a bunch of stories on this but still feel like I haven’t gotten all the numbers. What percentage of registered voters voted? And what were the tallies & percentages pro/con recall in each election?

    Reply