Misinformation Online

In recent years, several new options have emerged in the social media universe, many of which explicitly present themselves as alternatives to more established social media platforms. Free speech ideals and heated political themes prevail on these sites, which draw praise from their users and skepticism from other Americans.

Public views are tied to how these technologies would be used and what constraints would be in place.

Asked to "imagine a better world online," experts hope for a ubiquitous – even immersive – digital environment that promotes fact-based knowledge, offers better defense of individuals’ rights, empowers diverse voices and provides tools for technology breakthroughs and collaborations to solve the world’s wicked problems.

The declining public trust in the news media and polarization of news audiences have profound effects on civic life.

Many experts say public online spaces will significantly improve by 2035 if reformers, big technology firms, governments and activists tackle the problems created by misinformation, disinformation and toxic discourse. Others expect continuing troubles as digital tools and forums are used to exploit people’s frailties, stoke their rage and drive them apart.

48% of US adults say the government should restrict false information online, even if it means losing some freedom to access/publish content.

Here are five facts about how much Americans have heard about the QAnon conspiracy theories and their views about them.

Just one-in-ten Americans say social media sites have a mostly positive effect on the way things are going in the U.S. today.

Videos from independent news producers are more likely to cover subjects negatively and discuss conspiracy theories.

73% of Americans express little or no confidence in tech companies to prevent the misuse of their platforms to influence the 2020 election.