State among adults who say that stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy by religious group (2014) Switch to: Religious tradition among adults who say that stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy by state

% of adults who say that stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy who are in…

Religious traditionAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingSample size
Catholic< 1%< 1%2%< 1%16%1%2%< 1%< 1%6%1%< 1%< 1%6%2%1%1%1%2%< 1%2%4%3%2%< 1%2%< 1%1%1%< 1%4%1%9%1%< 1%3%< 1%1%5%1%1%< 1%1%9%< 1%< 1%1%1%< 1%2%< 1%2,856
Evangelical Protestant3%< 1%2%2%9%2%< 1%< 1%< 1%6%5%< 1%1%3%3%1%1%3%1%< 1%1%< 1%3%1%2%3%< 1%1%1%< 1%1%1%2%4%< 1%4%2%2%3%< 1%2%< 1%4%9%< 1%< 1%3%2%1%2%< 1%4,340
Historically Black Protestant5%< 1%< 1%1%4%1%1%< 1%1%9%9%< 1%< 1%4%1%< 1%< 1%1%6%< 1%2%1%3%< 1%3%2%< 1%< 1%1%< 1%2%< 1%4%6%< 1%4%1%< 1%4%< 1%4%< 1%3%7%< 1%< 1%5%< 1%< 1%2%< 1%640
Jewish1%< 1%2%< 1%13%1%1%1%< 1%12%2%< 1%< 1%5%1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%2%2%2%< 1%< 1%1%< 1%< 1%1%< 1%14%< 1%24%1%< 1%2%< 1%1%3%< 1%1%< 1%2%3%< 1%< 1%3%1%< 1%< 1%< 1%196
Mainline Protestant2%< 1%2%1%8%2%1%< 1%< 1%6%2%< 1%1%4%2%2%2%1%1%< 1%3%2%5%3%1%2%< 1%1%1%< 1%1%1%4%3%1%5%2%1%7%< 1%2%1%2%7%< 1%< 1%3%1%2%2%< 1%2,306
Mormon1%1%8%1%10%4%1%< 1%< 1%2%1%< 1%5%< 1%1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%< 1%1%2%1%< 1%3%< 1%< 1%1%1%1%< 1%1%1%4%1%< 1%1%< 1%1%6%28%< 1%3%6%1%< 1%1%363
Unaffiliated (religious "nones")1%< 1%3%1%14%2%1%< 1%< 1%7%1%1%1%4%2%1%1%1%1%1%1%2%3%1%1%2%1%1%1%1%2%1%6%3%< 1%5%1%1%3%< 1%1%< 1%2%6%1%< 1%3%2%1%2%< 1%1,908
Sample sizes and margins of error vary from subgroup to subgroup, from year to year and from state to state. You can see the sample size for the estimates in this chart on rollover or in the last column of the table. And visit this table to see approximate margins of error for a group of a given size. Readers should always bear in mind the approximate margin of error for the group they are examining when making comparisons with other groups or assessing the significance of trends over time. For full question wording, see the survey questionnaire.

Learn More: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming