August 30, 2013

Black incomes are up, but wealth isn’t

black-whiteAssetsSince the 1960s, household-income growth for African-Americans has outpaced that of whites. Median adjusted household income for blacks is now 59.2% that of whites, up slightly from 55.3% in 1967 (though in dollar terms the gap has widened).

But those gains haven’t led to any narrowing of the wealth gap between the races. In fact, after adjusting for inflation, the median net worth for black households in 2011 ($6,446) was lower than it was in 1984 ($7,150), while white households’ net worth was almost 11% higher. And as NYU researcher David Low noted in a recent working paper, high-earning married black households have, on average, less wealth than low-earning married white households.

Exactly why income gains haven’t translated into wealth gains for blacks is something of a puzzle. Researchers have identified several possible factors — less intergenerational inheritance, higher unemployment and lower incomes, differing rates and patterns of homeownership, marriage and college education — without reaching any consensus on their relative importance. As Low commented, “[t]here is…little quantitative understanding of why the black-white wealth gap exists, despite an almost embarrassing number of potential explanations.”

black-whiteDebtWe decided to examine the differing compositions of black and white household wealth with data from the Federal Reserve’s triennial Survey of Consumer Finances. We looked at average asset ownership and debt levels, rather than medians, so we could see how much each component contributed to total net worth. (Bear in mind that averages are skewed by households at the top of the wealth distribution, and that the average for any given asset class includes households who don’t own those particular assets. Accordingly, these data say more about blacks and whites as groups than about the “typical” African-American or white household.)

Value of primary residence was the single biggest asset for both groups, but much more so for black households: On average, housing wealth accounted for 49% of black household assets, compared with 28% for the average white household. But the average home value was far lower for black households: $75,040 versus $217,150.

A 2013 Brandeis University report noted that not only is home ownership lower among blacks than whites, but that black-owned homes tend not to appreciate in value as much as white-owned homes, which the Brandeis researchers attributed to “residential segregation artificially lower[ing] demand, placing a forced ceiling on home equity for African-Americans who own homes in non-white neighborhoods.” Blacks also tend to carry proportionately more mortgage debt, at higher rates, than whites. And, as a 2011 Pew Research Center report found, the housing crash was harder on blacks than whites (though both groups fared better than Hispanics).

Beyond housing, one striking difference between black and white household assets was the role of business ownership. Equity in businesses was the second-biggest asset class among white households, accounting for 18% of average assets, and grew 106% in value between 1983 and 2010. Among black households, however, business equity accounted for less than 4% of assets on average, and actually lost value between 1983 and 2010. After primary residence, the single biggest asset type for black households was “other residential property,” accounting for about 12% of average assets; but that asset class only grew 37% in value between 1983 and 2010.

Retirement accounts were the third-biggest asset class, on average, for both black and white households, and rose in value over the past three decades at similar rates. But black households, on average, started out with far less in their accounts: $1,496 in 1983, compared with $9,483 for white households.

The Brandeis researchers argue that, due to discriminatory employment patterns, “black workers predominate in fields that are least likely to have employer-based retirement plans and other benefits, such as administration and support and food services. As a result, wealth in black families tends to be close to what is needed to cover emergency savings while wealth in white families is well beyond the emergency threshold and can be saved or invested more readily.”

Average household debt rose steadily among both whites and blacks from 1983 to 2007. But while white households’ debt continued to rise between 2007 and 2010, to an average $113,598, it fell among black households over the same period, to an average $53,199 — mainly because of a decline in home mortgage debt. Overall, though, blacks continue to carry more debt relative to their household assets than do whites: 34.5% of average assets, versus 14.5% for white households.

Topics: African Americans, Economics and Personal Finances, Homeownership, Wealth

  1. Photo of Drew DeSilver

    is a Senior Writer at the Pew Research Center.

Leave a Comment

Or

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

2 Comments

  1. Orlando coombs3 weeks ago

    The real wealth gap is this: 1 percent of the population in America owns 96 percent of the wealth. 99 percent of us are fighting for crumbs. That’s the real wealth gap. Cause the elites don’t care about what group of people who makes an extra $20,000.00 a year. They don’t care who got a college degree and who don’t. Cause remember this. Cause the poor keep scores with cars and clothes, the middle-class keep score with degrees and titles, and the wealthy keep score with their bank accounts. And elite of this country and the world got the biggest bank accounts in human history. You can’t even put a number on it. The Rockefellers and the rothchilds got over 300 trillion or more between them. This is built up over centuries. That’s not something built over a decade or so. That’s built up over generations, even centuries. Them two families which have many fixed marriages between them have more liquid cash assets than most nations around the world. That’s the real wealth gap.

    Reply
  2. Orlando coombs4 weeks ago

    You must understand that blacks from jump street are already starting with less. And when you start with less due to intergenerational poverty, institutional racism, job discrimination, poor education, and long term unemployment you usually end up with less. That’s the same for people of any race. But we got many places in America where our people are doing great. 70 to 80 percent of African-Americans are middle-class. Only 20 percent of blacks are living in ghettos and in poverty. About 10 percent of blacks live in extreme poverty. You have about 15 to 20 percent of blacks in America locked into a permanent underclass. Awash in extreme poverty, crime, violence, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic unemployment, incarceration, poor health, lack of education, and deplorable living conditions. These things kill the human spirit. Plus with most of the poor African-American girls and boys without fathers contributes immensely to the poverty. This causes low self-esteem in children which leads bad decisions and bad choices which leads to an increasingly difficult life. Plus women can’t raise boys to be men, they can’t do it. Cause more young boys black, white, and across the board had fathers, the jails would be empty. Cause these young girls and boys would make better choices due to good self-esteem
    and the proper guidance and discipline. Their lives would have more hope and they would feel better about themselves cause when you feel good about yourself and your life you make good choices and decisions because your life takes on a greater purpose. Inner thoughts and feelings dictate the outcome of your life cause guides your decisions. Life is about choices.

    Reply