July 3, 2013

Polling’s mixed message for 2014, 2016

At midyear, the national opinion polls provide little indication of which way the political wind is blowing looking ahead to 2014, and 2016. Most of the key public opinion measures are mixed, or uncertain.

Obama’s Standing – Historically, second term presidencies are often full of surprises and many of them unpleasant. Absent a surprise, so far, public opinion on Obama is running ahead of George W. Bush, but behind where both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, whose unexpected troubles revealed themselves two years into their second term.

So far there is little indication that recent Washington controversies have hurt Obama. Yes, the release of a recent CNN survey made quite a stir when it showed the president’s approval rating slipping significantly amidst the fallout from the IRS and the NSA surveillance controversies. But most other national polls, including the Pew Research Center’s, have shown little movement of late. For the most part, Obama’s approval score is mixed and below the 50% mark. Last week’s Gallup rating was 47% approve: 45% disapprove. Pew Research had him at 49%:43%. This compares to CNN’s 45%:54% rating.

And most importantly, Pew Research found the public remains divided over whether Obama’s policies have made economic conditions better or worse (35% for each); with 27% saying his policies have had no effect so far.

One worry for the Democrats is how Obama is faring with the “base”. The Pew Research Center’s June survey found a January to June slippage in strong approval of the President among Democrats, and a Washington Post/ABC poll showed Obama’s personal favorable ratings slipping among members of his party. In that survey, “just 58 percent of Democrats described themselves as having a strongly favorable view of Obama, down from 72 percent who said the same in January.”

Economic Attitudes –Although the real estate and stock markets have improved in 2013, that has not been enough to dramatically jump start the public’s economic confidence. While the Gallup Poll’s economic confidence index is better than in 2012, it remains mixed. In late June, it found 46% of Americans saying the economy is getting better and 50% saying it is getting worse. At the same time, a Pew Research Center survey found a growing number, but still only 33% of its respondents thinking the economy would improve next year. The Pew Research report observed that economic confidence looks good “only when compared with the dismal attitudes of the past five years.”

Partisan Advantage – The national image of the Democratic party remains stronger than that of the GOP. The Republicans have come to be seen as the more extreme party, and as unwilling to compromise in dealing with the nation’s major budgetary problems. Currently, our poll shows 51% of the public holds a positive view of the Democrats, compared to just 40% for the GOP. However, the party’s image disparities notwithstanding, Americans rate the parties about equally for dealing with the major problems such as the economy, immigration and gun control. This only casts further doubt that the more popular Democrats can make progress in 2014, especially in the House, where the Republicans lost the popular vote in 2012, but kept control of the lower chamber.

National Leaders – Despite some recent slippage, clearly Hillary Clinton is the most popular national figure. No other Democrat, not to mention Republican, comes close to her public stature. She will certainly enjoy a huge reputational advantage over other Democrats if she chooses to run in 2016. However, Democrats don’t have a good track record for nominating front runners, and the post Obama Democratic coalition may well hold some surprises.

On the Republican side, where early front-runners more often succeed, there are none. The likes of Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and others will have to contend with a GOP divided between, the Tea Party, and more Main Street Republicans, not to mention a high-profile libertarian minority. How, and if the party broadens its national base and moderates its image will be crucial factors affecting both who will be the nominee and how well he or she will fare.

Stay Tuned!

Topics: Barack Obama, National Economy, U.S. Political Parties

  1. Photo of Andrew Kohut

    is Founding Director of the Pew Research Center.

Leave a Comment

Or

All comments must follow the Pew Research comment policy and will be moderated before posting.

6 Comments

  1. chris12 months ago

    The Democrats do nothing for me. As for the Republicans what has happened to them? They are so extreme. The Tea Party might be dead but their influence still is strong in the US House. It makes me upset how their tone is with Hispanics because its very poor and at times demeaning. I’m a moderate northeast republican and there is no like no place for me in the party nationally. All the big money and religious groups have taken over the party not to mention the Fox New Arm and talk radio. They think the party wasn’t conservative enough(the talk radio and fox news commentators.) They are so wrong Romney ran to the extreme right on issues like immigration(self-deport) and abortion(leave it to the states.) Its like the top people in the Republican Party don’t understand Generation Y and Hispanics.

    Reply
    1. jdahunt12 months ago

      Chris….the repub party would be better without people like you…..after trying middle of the road candidates such as McCain and Romney hopefully the rest of the repubs realize their only hope is to run a true fullblown conservative.

      As a party we are better off losing to liberals, letting them ruin everything like they eventually will then watch as the country turns to another conservative Reagan like candidate to fix everything once again.

      Reply
      1. BRT11 months ago

        You obviously don’t know what you are talking about. McCain lost because of Palin, and Romney lost because he wasn’t playing the middle, he was pandering to the extreme right.

        How many times must it be said? The vast majority of Americans, Republican, Democrat or Independent are moderate and sit smack in the middle of the political spectrum.

        Romney lost because he played to the far right. Those that would have abandoned Obama in the 2012 election (Independents) saw Romney as an extreme right-winged candidate that would relitigate Roe, and would have furthered the growing class disparity.

        Republicans will continue to lose because they have no platform to run on. You can’t win elections by pure hatred, you also have to stand for something or have some kind of plan. Republicans have neither.

        BTW, Reagan won because of his message of hope, the same one Obama adopted to win in 2008. His “success” came from working with Democrats. So the current Republican has strayed very far from the lessons of Reagan, and the current crop of Republicans are too cowardly to take on the extremists that will never ever win national elections.

        Reply
  2. Raymond Schalk1 year ago

    Agree 100 p.ercent!! Most of the criticism is hogwash!

    Reply
  3. MendoChuck1 year ago

    Good news in my book . . . .
    Maybe more people are actually paying attention, which is what we really need.
    I personally would love to see both Democrats and Republicans loose ground and at least one of the Third Parties gain some traction.
    I do not see any other way that we can actually wake up Washington DC to work for the general public.

    But that is this guys opinion and we will see . . . .

    Reply
    1. BRT11 months ago

      Impossible. Third parties cannot win unless we do away with the electoral college. In fact, that is one of the reasons the electoral college system was adopted.

      In states with a small population, Independents can win such as Bernie Sanders in Vermont. But, it doesn’t really work in populated states where the voting numbers are so much higher.

      It certainly will never work to elect a president.

      Reply