February 21, 2017

Public divided over Keystone XL, Dakota pipelines; Democrats turn decisively against Keystone

Americans are divided over whether to build the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines – issues that returned to the forefront after President Donald Trump signed executive orders to move forward on their construction.

The Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines have become touchstones in the debate over energy and the environment. While parts of the larger Keystone pipeline have already been completed, the Dakota Access pipeline is in earlier stages of development.

About four-in-ten (42%) favor building the Keystone XL pipeline, while 48% are opposed, according to a national Pew Research Center survey conducted Feb. 7-12, 2017, among 1,503 U.S. adults. The pipeline, which would carry oil from Canada’s oil sands region through the Midwest to refineries on the Gulf Coast, had been blocked by the Obama administration over environmental concerns.

Support for Keystone XL has fallen since 2014, largely because of a sharp decline among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. The share of the overall public favoring the pipeline has fallen 17 percentage points since 2014 (from 59% to 42%). Just 17% of Democrats favor building the pipeline, less than half the share that did so three years ago (44%).

Views of the Dakota Access pipeline, which would carry oil thorough North and South Dakota, are similar to opinions about Keystone XL: 43% favor building the Dakota Access pipeline, while 48% are opposed.

The partisan gap over Keystone XL is stark. About three-quarters (76%) of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents favor building the Keystone XL pipeline; about as many Democrats (74%) are opposed.

Republicans’ views of the pipeline have changed little in recent years, but in November 2014 Democrats were divided (44% favored, 46% opposed). In March 2013, Democrats, by a 54% to 35% margin, favored building the Keystone XL pipeline.

Democrats continue to be ideologically divided over building the pipeline, but since 2014 support for the pipeline has fallen among the party’s liberals (from 33% then to just 9% now) and conservatives and moderates (51% then, 26% today).

Support for the Keystone XL pipeline has declined among nearly all demographic groups since 2014. As was the case then, there are gender, age and educational differences in attitudes about the project.

Most men favor building the Keystone pipeline, while most women are opposed. And while a majority of those 65 and older favor its construction, those younger than 30 oppose it by about two-to-one (59% to 29%). Adults who have not completed college also are more likely to favor Keystone than are those with at least a four-year degree.

Earlier this month, the Trump administration gave final approval to the Dakota Access pipeline, which would transport oil through the Dakota states. Construction of the Dakota Access pipeline has faced opposition from Native American groups and environmental activists.

As with Keystone XL, views among the public overall are mixed over building a Dakota Access pipeline: 48% say they oppose it, while 43% favor the project.

And again with the Dakota pipeline, there are sharp partisan divisions. About three-quarters of Republicans favor the project while 69% of Democrats say they oppose it.

Opinions among demographic subgroups mirror those of the Keystone XL pipeline, where support is stronger among men than women (50% vs 35%), and among older Americans more than younger one (59% of those 65 and older vs. 26% of those younger than 30).

As we found last month in our annual policy priorities release, views on prioritizing climate change and protecting the environment are about as politically divided as ever. A solid majority (62%) of Democrats now say that climate change should be a top priority, while only 15% of Republicans share this view. A decade ago this partisan divide was much smaller. In 2007, about half (47%) of Democrats prioritized dealing with global warming, compared with 26% of Republicans.

Note: Survey topline can be found here and methodology can be found here.

Topics: Business and Labor, Energy and Environment, Gender, Generations and Age, Political Polarization, U.S. Political Parties

  1. Photo of Rob Suls

    is a research associate focusing on U.S. politics and policy at Pew Research Center.

9 Comments

  1. Anonymous2 months ago

    So the way you broke down the numbers and the factors you used make your poll say that uneducated Republican men, over 65 support the pipeline. Could your findings be any more biased? Or are sex, political affiliation and education the only relevant factors in this issue. It’s about an oil pipeline, do you think perhaps any other issues might come into play. Or lets throw out other random percentages. How many percent are left handed, have red hair, drive motorcycles. These facts have as little bearing on the subject as yours.

  2. Anonymous2 months ago

    People You need to do research on line about the Tar Sans because the media has not done their job on this subject. Do yourself a favor and read. This is not the same as regular oil. Its a very different kind of oil and you will kick yourself for not learning about it and the implications of the mining and moving it to protect your family. There are a lot of articles. If you trust real scientists, Read James Hansen the leading climatologist from NASA. He recently resigned from Nasa to work full time on educating the public about the Tar Sans oil, climate changes and Transportation problems.

  3. Anonymous2 months ago

    Anonymous, regarding your comment of ‘Independents’, I have not seen any evidence of their opinion. For all we know, they favor Bernie’s opinion that the Keystone XL is a really bad idea and NOT in the interest of the American people.

    But regardless of that, take this comment :

    “Opinions among demographic subgroups mirror those of the Keystone XL pipeline, where support is stronger among men than women (50% vs 35%), and among older Americans more than younger one (59% of those 65 and older vs. 26% of those younger than 30).”

    Thank you very much.

  4. Anonymous2 months ago

    One of the reasons the Liberals have turned against the pipeline is because Trump is for it!
    It’s called cognitive dissidents!

    1. Anonymous2 months ago

      Cognitive dissidents can be influenced and even controlled by the media and other special interests groups. Follow the road of your own God given intellect and common sense. Building the pipeline will bring in many jobs and increase America’s independence of oil reliance in the middle East by connecting pipelines from Canada to the gulf coast. The conservationalist are concerned with the fact that it could destroy the land and the different species that rely on it. This shouldn’t be an issue based on a particular party or person making the decision. Obama refused to build the pipeline and Trump wants it built. So the initiative to take is to make sure that we agree on a pipeline that is built with a strong agricultural and conservational consciousness.

  5. Anonymous2 months ago

    There are more Independents than Democrats or Republicans these days. Independents are almost as strongly for the Pipeline as Republicans. This was not mentioned, why? At least that was the case. By breaking it down to just Democrats and Republicans it leaves a lot of us out and throws the whole argument about total population studies in question. Are independents left out or is everyone niched into one side or the other or what? I was left with more questions than I started with, and the answers we got seemed pretty fuzzy.

    1. Boogie Nikkita2 months ago

      What proof do you have that independents favor the pipeline as much as Republicans??

    2. Anonymous2 months ago

      I agree, the independent voice needs to be heard. The problem is that a lot of independents don’t go out and vote for either partie’s candidates. When you don’t vote, then why grumble and complain about the decisions that your dignitaries make.

    3. Anonymous2 months ago

      They have Rep Lean and Dem Lean. I read those as independents who identified as as more Republican leaning or Democratic leaning. I suppose there are some true centrist independents out there, but there are very few of them. If I am reading this correctly then most people are covered.