June 24, 2015

Today’s multiracial babies reflect America’s changing demographics

The Changing Face of Multiracial America, According to Census DataTo get a glimpse of how America’s racial demographics are changing, take a look at the differences between mixed-race Americans old and young.
The racial background of the largest group of multiracial babies (36%) is black and white, but just 18% of mixed-race adults claim this background, according to Census Bureau data.

Among multiracial adults, meanwhile, the largest share (25%) identifies as white and American Indian; this is more than twice the share among multiracial babies (11%).

A Profile of Multiracial Babies, According to Census DataA similar pattern emerges for mixed-race people whose background is black and American Indian – among adults, the share is 5%, while among babies, it is just 1%. And while almost a quarter of mixed-race babies are white and Asian, this share is just 18% for adults.

Not only does the face of multiracial America appear to be transforming across generations, but the prevalence of mixed-race Americans is changing as well. One-in-ten babies living with two parents were multiracial in 2013, up from just 1% in 1970, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of census data.

Rapid increases in mixed-race marriages have likely fueled much of the rise in the share of multiracial babies in the past several decades. Since just 1980, the share of marriages between spouses of different races has almost quadrupled, up to 6%, a new Pew Research study on multiracial Americans has found. At the same time, though, a large share of mixed-race babies (43%) are not living with a married parent, suggesting that it’s probably not just interracial marriage, but interracial dating in general that is driving the demographic change.

Topics: Demographics, Household and Family Structure, Race and Ethnicity, U.S. Census

  1. Photo of Gretchen Livingston

    is a senior researcher focusing on fertility and family demographics at Pew Research Center.

5 Comments

  1. Angel Dubon8 months ago

    after reading this article I can deduce that my children do not exist, puede ser que nuestro acento no es concordante con el interes del editor

  2. Eric Melton9 months ago

    Trashing what’s always been

  3. Sameera1 year ago

    I’m with Frank Lewis, that 36% statistic of Black-white seems a tad high. It’s all good. Now we can stop speaking in polarized fashion when we talk about races. Race is only one of many ways in which people seek to separate themselves from others….all because we have eyes and can see. If we didn’t have the quality of sight, how dark or light, tall or short, handsome/pretty or not so handsome/pretty would have no relevance to how we felt or dealt with one another.

  4. Frank Lewis1 year ago

    Where are the white / Latin percent age. I would guess this highest mixture. I find the black white Rate of 36% not to be believable.

    1. Marcus Tanaka de Lira1 year ago

      Well, Latin isn’t usually considered a race, but simply a place of origin, as there are white Hispanics and black Hispanics, among other possibilities. That would explain the omission.

      As for White/Black kids, they’re 36% of all “multiracial” babies, not 36% of all births. Since Whites and Blacks vastly outnumber Asians, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders in America, isn’t this high number precisely what you’d expect?