---
title: "Most Americans want to limit campaign spending, say big donors have greater political influence"
description: "Americans overwhelmingly support limits on political campaign spending, and most think new laws could effectively reduce the role of money in politics."
date: "2018-05-08"
authors:
  - name: "Bradley Jones"
    job_title: "Former Senior Researcher"
    link: "https://www.pewresearch.org/staff/bradley-jones/"
url: "https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/"
categories:
  - "U.S. Elections & Voters"
---

# Most Americans want to limit campaign spending, say big donors have greater political influence

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/05/FT_18.05.07_campaign-finance_1.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/ft_18-05-07_campaign-finance_1/)

Americans overwhelmingly support limits on political campaign spending, and most think new laws could effectively reduce the role of money in politics.

A [recent Pew Research Center report](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/04/26/the-public-the-political-system-and-american-democracy/) finds several indications of public concern over campaign spending. There is widespread – and bipartisan – agreement that people who make large political donations should not have more political influence than others, but Americans largely don’t see that as a description of the country today.

And there is extensive support for reining in campaign spending: 77% of the public says “there should be limits on the amount of money individuals and organizations” can spend on political campaigns; just 20% say they should be able to spend as much as they want.

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/05/FT_18.05.07_campaign-finance_2.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/ft_18-05-07_campaign-finance_2/)

A somewhat smaller majority (65%) says that new campaign finance laws could be written that would be effective in reducing the role of money in politics, while 31% say any new laws would not be effective.

Democrats are more likely to support limits on campaign spending than are Republicans, and there is a similar gap in views on whether effective laws could be written. Still, 71% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say there should be limits on campaign spending and 54% say new laws that would be effective in limiting the influence of money in politics could be written. Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, even larger majorities favor spending limits (85%) and think new laws would be effective (77%).

Nearly three-quarters of the public (74%) says it is very important that major political donors not have more influence than others, while an additional 16% view this as somewhat important.

However, only a relatively small share of the public feels this is actually the case today. About a quarter (26%) feel that the statement “people who give a lot of money to elected officials do not have more influence than others” describes the country very or somewhat well; roughly seven-in-ten (72%) say this does not describe the country well, with 43% saying it describes it “not at all well.”

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/05/FT_18.05.07_campaign-finance_3.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/ft_18-05-07_campaign-finance_3/)

Across the political spectrum, few people think that big donors *do* *not* command more influence than others: Only about a quarter of those in both parties say this describes the country well. But Democrats are more likely than Republicans (50% vs. 35%) to say this statement describes the country not at all well.

Those who have contributed to candidates or campaigns themselves in recent years – [the vast majority of whom make donations of less than $250](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/04/26/10-political-engagement-knowledge-and-the-midterms/#campaign-contributions-most-are-less-than-250) – are particularly likely to reject the characterization of the country as a place where people who give a lot of money to elected officials do not have more influence than others: 50% say this does not describe the country at all well, compared with 41% of those who have not given a political contribution in the past five years.

#### Contributors more likely to see elected officials as responsive

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/05/FT_18.05.07_campaign-finance_4.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/ft_18-05-07_campaign-finance_4/)

Those who have contributed money to a political candidate or group in the past year are much more likely than those who have not made a recent contribution to say that their representative in Congress would help them if they had a problem. They are also more likely to say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington if they are willing to make the effort.

Overall, 37% of Americans say that they feel it is at least somewhat likely their representative would help them with a problem if they contacted her or him. However, about half (53%) of those who have given money to a political candidate or group in the last year believe their representative would help. Belief that one’s member of Congress will help them with a problem is highest (63%) among the subset of donors who have given more than $250 to a candidate or campaign in the past year.

A similar pattern is seen on the question of whether or not people feel ordinary citizens can make a difference. Among those who did not make a political contribution in the past year, about half say there is a lot ordinary citizens can do to influence the government in Washington. By comparison, 66% of donors, including 74% of those who gave more than $250, say there is a lot ordinary citizens can do to make a difference.