---
title: "How citizens and investigative journalists handle privacy protection"
description: "The public's muted response on possible government monitoring of their online behavior differs from that of investigative journalists, whose work makes them potential targets for monitoring."
date: "2015-03-27"
authors:
  - name: "Michael Barthel"
    job_title: "Former Senior Researcher"
    link: "https://www.pewresearch.org/staff/michael-barthel/"
url: "https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/03/27/how-citizens-and-investigative-journalists-handle-privacy-protection/"
categories:
  - "Digital News Landscape"
  - "Digital News Landscape"
  - "Journalists"
  - "Journalists"
  - "Media Industry"
  - "Online Privacy & Security"
  - "Privacy Rights"
---

# How citizens and investigative journalists handle privacy protection

The American public has had a muted response when it comes to concerns about possible government monitoring of their digital behavior, and many have not yet adopted – or are even aware of – many of the tools available to protect their online privacy and security, according to [a new Pew Research Center study](https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/03/16/Americans-Privacy-Strategies-Post-Snowden/).

But it is a different story for a group like investigative journalists, whose work makes them potential targets for monitoring.

[![Some Investigative Journalists Have Increased Privacy and Security; Many Were Already Taking Precautions](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2015/03/FT_IRE-precautions_032715.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/?attachment_id=268300)

In our [survey of U.S. members of Investigative Reporters & Editors](https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2015/02/05/investigative-journalists-and-digital-security/), most of the investigative journalists assume that they are being monitored because of the nature of their work: 64% believe that the government probably collected their communications data.

And many have long since adopted various privacy and security measures. Most notably, 76% of the investigative journalists said they had been using a variety of passwords for more than a year, and 58% had been using enhanced privacy settings on social networking sites.

In addition, 59% of IRE reporters (a subset of the larger group of journalists) say that, to protect sources’ anonymity, they meet in person instead of using electronic communication – a decidedly non-digital form of security. Nearly half (48%) have done so for more than a year.

For this group of investigative journalists, there is far more concern about decreasing resources in newsrooms – the top-ranked issue they feel the profession is facing today.

In a different set of questions asked of the general public, 52% said they were [very or somewhat concerned](https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/03/16/Americans-Privacy-Strategies-Post-Snowden/#americans-are-split-when-it-comes-to-being-concerned-about-surveillance-programs) about government surveillance of Americans’ data and electronic communications, but a significant share – 46% – expressed little or no concern.

For those Americans who had heard about the surveillance programs, a minority had made any of the behavior changes included in the survey. Fewer than on-in-five who had heard about the programs reported changing privacy settings on social media (17%), avoiding using certain apps (15%), using social media less often (15%), speaking more in person than online or over the phone (14%), uninstalling certain apps (13%), avoiding the use of certain terms in online communication (13%), avoiding the use of some terms in search engine queries (11%), deleting social media accounts (8%), or making more phone calls instead of communicating online (8%). Overall, one-in-three (34%) who had heard about the programs say they have changed at least one of these behaviors since learning about the government monitoring programs.

[there’s a]