---
title: "Little Public Awareness of Outside Campaign Spending Boom"
description: "The public is hearing little about increased spending by outside groups in the 2012 election. Just 25% have heard a lot about outside spending by groups not associated with the candidates or campaigns, while three-quarters are hearing a little (36%) or nothing at all (39%) about this. In fact, the term “super PAC” itself is […]"
date: "2012-08-02"
authors:
  - name: "Pew Research Center"
url: "https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/"
categories:
  - "Election 2012"
  - "U.S. Elections & Voters"
datasets:
  - name: "July 26-29 2012 Weekly Survey"
    url: "https://www.pewresearch.org/dataset/july-26-29-2012-weekly-survey/"
---

# Little Public Awareness of Outside Campaign Spending Boom

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2012/08/8-2-12-WP-1.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/8-2-12-wp-1/)

The public is hearing little about increased spending by outside groups in the 2012 election. Just 25% have heard a lot about outside spending by groups not associated with the candidates or campaigns, while three-quarters are hearing a little (36%) or nothing at all (39%) about this. In fact, the term “super PAC” itself is not widely known: Just 40% can correctly identify the term, nearly half (46%) don’t know what it refers to, while 14% give incorrect responses.

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2012/08/8-2-12-WP-2.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/8-2-12-wp-2/)

When asked an open-ended question about the effect of increased outside spending on the election, a plurality (48%) expresses no opinion. About equal percentages indicate the effect will be neutral (27%) or negative (24%). Just 2% give a positive response about the effect of more outside political spending.

Those who have heard a lot about this issue –which includes nearly equal shares of Republicans and Democrats – nearly half (47%) say increased outside election spending say it will have a negative effect, while 35% say it will have a neutral effect. Among those who have heard little or nothing about increased outside spending, most (59%) have no opinion; 24% say the impact will neutral and 16% say it will be negative.

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2012/08/8-2-12-WP-3.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/8-2-12-wp-3/)

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and The Washington Post, conducted July 26-29, 2012 among 1,010 adults, finds that few people thing either Barack Obama or Mitt Romney is gaining an advantage as a result of increased election spending by outside groups. About half (51%) say neither candidate will benefit more than the other, 16% say Romney will benefit more than Obama, while about as many (15%) say Obama will benefit more than Romney.

There are only modest partisan differences in views of whether Obama or Romney will benefit more from increased spending by outside groups. A majority of Republicans (55%) and a plurality of Democrats (42%) say neither candidate will benefit more than the other.

Among those who have heard a lot about increased campaign spending by outside groups, 34% say Romney will benefit more than Obama, while 16% say Obama will benefit more.

### Super PACs Not Widely Known

[![](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2012/08/8-2-12-WP-4.png)](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/8-2-12-wp-4/)

Reflecting the public’s low level of awareness about campaign finance and this year’s election, just 40% can correctly identify a “super PAC” as a group that is able to accept unlimited political donations. Nearly half (46%) don’t know what the term refers to, while 14% give incorrect responses.

Partisan differences in knowledge of the term are modest. Seven-in-ten (70%) of those who have heard a lot about increased campaign spending by outside groups correctly identify a Super-PAC. That compared with just 30% of those who have heard less about the issue.