---
title: "References"
description: "1.         Oldenburg, R., The Great Good Place. 1989, New York: Paragon House. 2.         Wellman, B. and S. Wortley, Different Strokes From Different Folks. American Journal of Sociology, 1990. 96(3): p. 558-88. 3.         Erickson, B., The Relational Basis of Attitudes, in Social Structures: A Network Approach, B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, Editors. 1997, JAI press: Greenwich, [&hellip;]"
date: "2009-11-04"
authors:
  - name: "Pew Research Center"
url: "https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/11/04/references-3-4/"
---

# References

1. Oldenburg, R., *The Great Good Place*. 1989, New York: Paragon House.

2. Wellman, B. and S. Wortley, *Different Strokes From Different Folks.* American Journal of Sociology, 1990. **96**(3): p. 558-88.

3. Erickson, B., *The Relational Basis of Attitudes*, in *Social Structures: A Network Approach*, B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, Editors. 1997, JAI press: Greenwich, CT. p. 99-122.

4. Katz, E. and P. Lazarsfeld, *Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications*. 1955, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

5. Mutz, D., *Hearing the Other Side*. 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6. Wyatt, R.O., E. Katz, and J. Kim, *Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces.* Journal of Communication, 2000. **50**(1): p. 71-92.

7. Putnam, R., *Bowling Alone*. 2000, New York: Simon & Schuster.

8. Cohen, S., *Social Relationships and Health.* American Psychologist, 2004. **59**(8): p. 676-684.

9. Straits, B., *Ego's important discussants or significant people.* Social Networks, 2000. **22**(2): p. 123-140.

10. Abraham, K., S. Helms, and S. Presser, *How Social Processes Distort Measurement: The Impact of Survey Nonresponse on Estimates of Volunteer Work in the United States.* American Journal of Sociology, 2009. **114**(4): p. 1129-1165.

11. Smith, T., *2004 Social-Network Module, Draft 9/08*. 2008, Memorandum, National Opinion Research Center.

12. Marsden, P., *Core Discussions Networks of Americans.* American Sociological Review, 1987. **52**(1): p. 122-31.

13. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M.E. Brashears, *Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks Over Two Decades.* American Sociological Review, 2006. **71**(3): p. 353-375.

14. Fischer, C., *America Calling*. 1992, Berkeley: University of California Press.

15. Marvin, C., *When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century*. 1988, New York: Oxford University Press. 269.

16. Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellman, *Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb.* City and Community, 2003. **2**(3): p. 277-311.

17. Gilbert, E. and K. Karahalios, *Predicting tie strength with social media*, in *Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems*. 2009, ACM: Boston, MA, USA.

18. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook, *Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.* Annual Review of Sociology, 2001. **27**: p. 415-444.

19. Cross, R., R.E. Rice, and A. Parker, *Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits.* Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 2001. **31**(4): p. 438-448.

20. Burt, R., *Structural Holes*. 1992, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21. Granovetter, M., *The Strength of Weak Ties.* American Journal of Sociology, 1973. **78**(6): p. 1360-80.

22. Cohen, S., et al., *Social Integration and Health: The Case of the Common Cold.* Journal of Social Structure, 2000. **1**(3): p. 1-7.

23. Michelson, W., *Environmental Choice, Human Behavior and Residential Satisfaction*. 1977, New York: Oxford University Press.

24. Bellair, P.E., *Social Interaction and Community Crime.* Criminology, 1997. **35**: p. 677-703.

25. Sampson, R., *Collective Efficacy Theory*, in *Taking Stock*, F.T. Cullen, J.P. Wright, and K.R. Blevins, Editors. 2006, Transaction: New Brunswick, NJ. p. 149-168.

26. Lofland, L., *The Public Realm*. 1998, New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 305.

27. Sennett, R., *The Fall of Public Man*. 1977, New York: Knopf.

28. Hampton, K.N., O. Livio, and L.F. Sessions, *The Social Life of Wireless Urban Spaces:Internet Use, Social Networks, and the Public Realm.* Journal of Communication, in press.

29. Hampton, K.N. and N. Gupta, *Community and Social Interaction in the Wireless City.* New Media & Society, 2008. **10**(6): p. 831-850.

30. Killworth, P., et al., *Estimating the Size of Personal Networks.* Social Networks, 1990. **12**: p. 289-312.

31. Lin, N. and B.H. Erickson, *Social Capital*. 2008, New York, NY: Oxford.

32. Lin, N. and M. Dumin, *Access to Occupations through Social Ties.* Social Networks, 1986. **8**: p. 365-383.

33. Wellman, B., *Physical Place and Cyber-Place: Changing Portals and the Rise of Networked Individualism.* International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, 2001. **25**(2): p. 227-52.

34. Ishii, K., *Implications of Mobility.* Journal of Communication, 2006. **56**(2): p. 346-365.

35. Ling, R.S., *New tech, new ties : how mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion*. 2008, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36. Gergen, K.J., *Mobile Communication and the Transformation of the Democratic Process*, in *Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies*, J.E. Katz, Editor. 2008, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 297-310.

37. Nie, N., D.S. Hillygus, and L. Erbring, *Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study*, in *The Internet in Everyday Life*, B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite, Editors. 2002, Oxford: Blackwell.

38. Robinson, J. and J.D. Haan, *Information Technology and Family Time Displacement*, in *Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology*, R. Kraut, M. Brynin, and S. Keisler, Editors. 2006, Oxford University press: New York. p. 51-69.

39. Kraut, R., et al., *Internet Paradox Revisited.* Journal of Social Issues, 2002. **58**(1): p. 49-74.

40. Boase, J., et al., *The Strength of Internet Ties*. 2006, Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC. p. 52.

41. Boase, J., *Personal Networks and the Personal Communication System.* Information, Communication & Society, 2008. **11**(4): p. 490 - 508.

42. Marlow, C., *The Structural Determinants of Media Contagion*, in *Media Lab*. 2005, MIT: Cambridge, MA.

43. Zhao, S., *Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Differentiated Analyses of Internet Use.* Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2006. **11**(3): p. article 8.

44. Steinfield, C., N.B. Ellison, and C. Lampe, *Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites.* Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008. **29**: p. 434-445.

45. Gennaro, C.D. and W.H. Dutton, *Reconfiguring Friendships: Social relationships and the Internet.* Information, Communication & Society, 2007. **10**(5): p. 591 - 618.

46. Rice, R.E., et al., *Social interaction and the Internet: A comparative analysis of surveys in the US and Britain*, in *Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology*, A. Joinson, et al., Editors. 2007, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 7-30.

47. Wang, H. and B. Wellman, *Social Connectivity in America.* American Behavioral Scientist, in press.

48. Mesch, G.S. and Y. Levanon, *Community Networking and Locally-Based Social Ties in Two Suburban Localities.* City & Community, 2003. **2**(4): p. 335-351.

49. Kavanaugh, A., et al., *Community Networks.* Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2005. **10**(4): p. article 3.

50. Kavanaugh, A., D.D. Reese, and J.M. Carroll, *Weak Ties in Networked Communities*, in *Communities and Technologies*, M. Huysman, E. Wenger, and V. Wulf, Editors. 2003, Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, Netherlands. p. 265-286.

51. Boulianne, S., *Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Reseatch.* Political Communication, 2009. **26**(2): p. 193-211.

52. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M.E. Brashears, *Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.* American Sociological Review, 2008. **73**: p. 1022-1022.

53. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M.E. Brashears, *Models and Marginals: Using Survey Evidence to Study Social Networks.* American Sociological Review, 2009.

54. Fischer, C., *To Dwell Among Friends*. 1982, Berkeley: University of California Press.

55. Fischer, C., *The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact?* American Sociological Review, 2009. **74**(4).