<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pew Research Center &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pewresearch.org</link>
	<description>Just another Pew Research site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>As Supreme Court Weighs Voting Rights Act Changes, No Racial Gap in Voting Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/20/as-supreme-court-weighs-voting-rights-act-changes-no-racial-gap-in-voting-problems/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=as-supreme-court-weighs-voting-rights-act-changes-no-racial-gap-in-voting-problems</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/20/as-supreme-court-weighs-voting-rights-act-changes-no-racial-gap-in-voting-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=247230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Andrew Kohut In the next several weeks the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the requirement that several states, mostly in the South, get &#8220;pre-clearance&#8221; from the Justice Department before they make any changes to their election laws. The requirement was part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Andrew Kohut</em></p>
<p>In the next several weeks the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the requirement that several states, mostly in the South, get &#8220;pre-clearance&#8221; from the Justice Department before they make any changes to their election laws. The requirement was part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was an emergency measure to outlaw the profound racial discrimination that was disenfranchising African-Americans.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" alt="" src="http://www.pewresearch.org/files/2013/05/no-racial-gap.png" width="216" height="568" />The justices won&#8217;t necessarily find a rationale for their decision based on current election polling data. Nevertheless, the experience of voters in recent elections will no doubt be illuminating to the justices, and to all Americans who are concerned with voting rights.</p>
<p>In the past three presidential elections, very few Americans reported having problems or difficulties voting according to Pew Research Center surveys. In its Nov. 8-12 poll in 2012, just 4% of whites answered yes to the question: &#8220;Did you have any problems or difficulties voting this year, or not.&#8221; Only 2% of African-Americans responded affirmatively.</p>
<p>Four years earlier, the comparable figures were 3% for whites and 4% for blacks, and in 2004, 5% and 3% respectively.</p>
<p>There were accusations leveled during the 2012 presidential campaign that black turnout was being discouraged in Florida and other key states by voter ID laws or attempts at deception or intimidation. Given these charges, Pew went a step further in the 2012 post-election survey than in previous surveys by asking voters if they knew anyone who tried to vote but could not. Blacks more often said they did than whites—14% versus 9%. But a follow-up question, &#8220;Why were those people not able to vote?&#8221; revealed that this difference was entirely accounted for by the fact that unlike whites, 6% of blacks reported knowing felons who tried to vote but could not.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323716304578483174116481426.html">Continue reading in The Wall Street Journal</a></p>
<p><em>Andrew Kohut is the founding director of the Pew Research Center.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/20/as-supreme-court-weighs-voting-rights-act-changes-no-racial-gap-in-voting-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorable Views of Supreme Court Remain Low</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/25/supreme-courts-favorable-rating-still-at-historic-low/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-courts-favorable-rating-still-at-historic-low</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/25/supreme-courts-favorable-rating-still-at-historic-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=245304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments on two same-sex marriage cases, the public’s views of the court have changed only modestly. They have remained low since the court’s ruling to uphold most of the Affordable Care Act.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments on two same-sex marriage cases, the public’s views of the court have changed only modestly. They have remained low since the court’s ruling to uphold most of the Affordable Care Act.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/25/supreme-courts-favorable-rating-still-at-historic-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Takes Up Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/20/supreme-court-takes-up-gay-marriage/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-takes-up-gay-marriage</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/20/supreme-court-takes-up-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=245222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 26 and 27, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a pair of potentially groundbreaking same-sex marriage cases.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[On March 26 and 27, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a pair of potentially groundbreaking same-sex marriage cases.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/20/supreme-court-takes-up-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Weighs in on Gay Marriage Case</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/01/obama-administration-weighs-in-on-gay-marriage-case/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-administration-weighs-in-on-gay-marriage-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/01/obama-administration-weighs-in-on-gay-marriage-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=244800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News outlets reported last night that the Obama administration has submitted a “friend-of-the-court” brief on the legal challenge to California’s gay marriage ban (Proposition 8), which will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[News outlets reported last night that the Obama administration has submitted a “friend-of-the-court” brief on the legal challenge to California’s gay marriage ban (Proposition 8), which will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/01/obama-administration-weighs-in-on-gay-marriage-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Holds Lead; Romney Trails on Most Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/12/obama-holds-lead-romney-trails-on-most-issues/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-holds-lead-romney-trails-on-most-issues</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/12/obama-holds-lead-romney-trails-on-most-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/12/obama-holds-lead-romney-trails-on-most-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the stagnant economy and broad dissatisfaction with national conditions, Barack Obama holds a significant lead over Mitt Romney. Obama is favored by a 50% to 43% margin among registered voters. Romney loses ground on issue of which candidate can best improve the economy.  ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Despite the stagnant economy and broad dissatisfaction with national conditions, Barack Obama holds a significant lead over Mitt Romney. Currently, Obama is favored by a 50% to 43% margin among registered voters nationwide. Obama has led by at least a slim margin in every poll this year, and there is no clear trend in either candidate&rsquo;s support since Romney wrapped up the GOP nomination.</p>
<p>The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People &amp; the Press, conducted June 28-July 9, 2012 among 2,973 adults, including 2,373 registered voters, finds that Romney has not seized the advantage as the candidate best able to improve the economy. In fact, he has lost ground on this issue over the past month.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court&rsquo;s recent ruling on the 2010 Affordable Care Act appears to have had little effect on the 2012 race. But the decision has had a substantial impact on views of the court itself.</p>
<p>About half of Americans (51%) express a favorable opinion of the court, while 37% have an unfavorable view, up eight points since April and the highest percentage expressing an unfavorable opinion in a trend dating to 1985.</p>
<p>The more negative view of the court is largely being driven by Republicans: Three months ago, Republicans viewed the Supreme Court favorably by a 56% to 25% margin. Today, they view the court unfavorably by a 51% to 38% margin.</p>
<p>The presidential campaign&rsquo;s dynamics have changed little in recent months, despite the court&rsquo;s high-profile health care ruling, a series of subpar job reports and increased campaign activity on the part of both candidates. Independent voters remain evenly divided, 46% support Romney while 45% back Obama.</p>
<p>The electorate remains deeply unhappy with the way things are going in the country. Just 28% of registered voters say they are satisfied with national conditions, while two-thirds (67%) are dissatisfied, which is largely unchanged from recent months. &nbsp;Poor job reports have not gone unnoticed by the public: 51% say they are hearing mostly bad news about the job situation, and 40% say the overall economic news is mostly bad. However, these evaluations are no worse than they were a month ago, and are not having a negative effect on impressions of Obama&rsquo;s performance. At 50%, his current job approval rating is actually up slightly from 47% last month and in positive territory for the first time since March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/12/obama-holds-lead-romney-trails-on-most-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Division, Uncertainty Over Court&#8217;s Health Care Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/02/division-uncertainty-over-courts-health-care-ruling/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=division-uncertainty-over-courts-health-care-ruling</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/02/division-uncertainty-over-courts-health-care-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Interest Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/02/division-uncertainty-over-courts-health-care-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American public is divided over the U.S. Supreme Court's decision upholding the 2010 health care law - 40% disapprove of the decision, while 36% approve. Nearly a quarter (24%) offer no opinion. And despite extensive public interest in the ruling, just 55% know that the Supreme Court upheld most of the law's provisions.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public has long been divided in its opinions about the 2010 health care law. There is now a similar division of opinion over last week’s Supreme Court decision to uphold the law – 40% say they disapprove of the decision, while 36% approve and nearly a quarter (24%) offer no opinion.</p>
<p>Despite extensive public interest in the court’s ruling, just 55% of the public knows that the Supreme Court upheld most of the health care law’s provisions; 45% say either that the court rejected most provisions (15%) or do not know what the court did (30%). Among those aware that the court upheld most of the law, 50% approve of the decision while 42% disapprove.</p>
<p>The persistent partisan divisions over the law are reflected in the public’s reactions to the court’s June 28 decision. Seven-in-ten Republicans disapprove of the Court’s decision, while 66% of Democrats approve of it. About four-in- ten (42%) independents disapprove of the ruling while 32% approve.</p>
<p>The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People &amp; the Press, conducted June 28 to July 1 among 1,006 adults, finds that the top single-word reactions to the court’s decision are “disappointed” and “surprised.” While “disappointed” is by far the top reaction among those who disapprove of the decision, “good,” “surprised” and “happy” are the top words among those who approve of the ruling.</p>
<p>The survey finds that 45% followed news about the court’s decision very closely, making it the second most closely followed story of 2012 (52% tracked news about rising gas prices in March).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/07/02/division-uncertainty-over-courts-health-care-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/06/18/any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/06/18/any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/06/18/any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public is unlikely to be satisfied with the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on the 2010 Affordable Care Act - no matter what the Court decides.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>The public is unlikely to be satisfied with the Supreme Court&#8217;s upcoming ruling on the 2010 Affordable Care Act &#8211; no matter what the Court decides. Whether the Court decides to uphold the entire law, overturn the entire law, or reject the &#8220;individual mandate&#8221; while allowing the rest of the law to remain in place, fewer than half of Americans say they would be happy with the decision.</p>
<p>The public&#8217;s expected reactions track along partisan lines. Most Democrats would be happy if the law is upheld, while most Republicans would be happy if it is thrown out.</p>
<p>Before the end of its current term, the Supreme Court also is expected to rule on Arizona&#8217;s immigration law, which requires police to determine the immigration status of people they have stopped whom they suspect might be in this country illegally. Most Americans continue to support the Arizona law: 58% approve while just 38% disapprove. This is slightly less support than the 64% who approved when the law was first passed in 2010.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/06/18/any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please/">full report</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/06/18/any-court-health-care-decision-unlikely-to-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Favorability Reaches New Low</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/05/01/supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/05/01/supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/05/01/supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public assessments of the Supreme Court have reached a quarter-century low. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Public assessments of the Supreme Court have reached a quarter-century low. Unlike evaluations over much of the past decade, there is very little partisan divide. The court receives relatively low favorable ratings from Republicans, Democrats and independents alike.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/01/supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low/?src=prc-headline">full report</a> for detailed findings.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/05/01/supreme-court-favorability-reaches-new-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hearings Hurt Public Regard for both Health Care Law and Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/04/02/hearings-hurt-public-regard-for-both-health-care-law-and-supreme-court/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hearings-hurt-public-regard-for-both-health-care-law-and-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/04/02/hearings-hurt-public-regard-for-both-health-care-law-and-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=38021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While most Americans say last week’s Supreme Court hearings on the 2010 health care law did not change their views of the law or of the Court, they did more harm than good to the image of both.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[While most Americans say last week’s Supreme Court hearings on the 2010 health care law did not change their views of the law or of the Court, they did more harm than good to the image of both.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/04/02/hearings-hurt-public-regard-for-both-health-care-law-and-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Brief: Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/01/11/in-brief-hosanna-tabor-v-eeoc/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=in-brief-hosanna-tabor-v-eeoc</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/01/11/in-brief-hosanna-tabor-v-eeoc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=37386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Oct. 5, 2011, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a case that could help determine how much latitude religious organizations have in making employment decisions about clergy and others who perform religious duties.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[On Oct. 5, 2011, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a case that could help determine how much latitude religious organizations have in making employment decisions about clergy and others who perform religious duties.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2012/01/11/in-brief-hosanna-tabor-v-eeoc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
