<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pew Research Center &#187; Government Spending and the Deficit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/government-spending-and-the-deficit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pewresearch.org</link>
	<description>Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- Cached by CDN, Generated: 2013-06-18 3:06:03 am EDT -->
<!-- 10.11.2.46 -->
		<item>
		<title>The Most Popular Areas of Government are Shedding the Most Workers</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=246910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Drew DeSilver Popularity is no protection against budget cuts: The parts of government that Americans like the most &#8212; state, cities and counties, and the U.S. Postal Service &#8212; are also the ones shedding workers the fastest. The most recent nonfarm payroll figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the public sector continues to be [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Drew DeSilver</em></p>
<p>Popularity is no protection against budget cuts: The parts of government that Americans like the most &#8212; state, cities and counties, and the U.S. Postal Service &#8212; are also the ones shedding workers the fastest.</p>
<p>The most recent nonfarm payroll <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">figures</a> from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the public sector continues to be a drag on overall employment. Governments at all levels have shed 835,300 jobs since public-sector employment peaked in April 2009 (not counting the spike in early 2010 caused by temporary Census workers). The private sector, meanwhile, has regained 6.78 million jobs since bottoming out in February 2010, and over the past year has averaged 180,500 new jobs a month.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-247048" alt="govjobs" src="http://www.pewresearch.org/files/2013/05/govjobs.png" width="421" height="293" />But the government-sector job cuts haven&#8217;t been spread evenly. In terms of sheer numbers, local schools have lost the most: 336,300 jobs over the past four years. Other local government cutbacks have eliminated 217,600 jobs; states (except for public colleges and universities) are down 160,300 jobs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/15/state-govermnents-viewed-favorably-as-federal-rating-hits-new-low/"><img class="alignright" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/04/4-15-13-1.png" width="296" height="330" /></a>In a Pew Research Center <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/15/state-govermnents-viewed-favorably-as-federal-rating-hits-new-low/">survey</a> conducted in March, 63% of people said they had a favorable opinion of their local government, a level that&#8217;s stayed fairly constant over several years; 57% expressed favorable views of their state government, a five-point uptick from last year. But  just 28% rated the federal government favorably, versus 65% unfavorably; the favorability rating was five points lower than a year earlier and the lowest ever in a Pew Research Center survey.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding the dim view most people take of the federal government, and despite the wide-ranging budget cuts known as &#8220;sequestration,&#8221; most of the federal payroll remains intact. Leaving aside one big exception, there were 20,000 fewer federal employees last month than there were four years earlier, a decline of less than 1%.</p>
<p>The exception is the long-suffering Postal Service, where employment is down by 132,300 jobs, or 18.3%, since April 2009. The Postal Service has been shedding workers for years, though the pace picked up during the recession; it accounts for 15.8% of all government job cuts since April 2009, even though it employed only 3.2% of the total government workforce.</p>
<p>Even so, the Postal Service is one of the better-regarded arms of the federal government. In a 2010 Pew Research <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2010/04/18/section-5-views-of-federal-departments-and-agencies/">survey</a>, 83% of people said they had a favorable opinion of the Postal Service, the highest level among the 13 agencies asked about. More recently, 60% of respondents in an NBC News/Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/wsjnbcpoll-02262013.pdf">poll</a> said they had &#8220;very&#8221; (28%) or &#8220;somewhat&#8221; (32%) positive feelings toward the Postal Service &#8212; more than President Obama, either major party, the Catholic Church or the NRA.</p>
<p>The one government sector that&#8217;s actually added jobs has been state education, which is up 31,200 jobs (or 1.3%) since April 2009. Although many <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/StudentsStates-Near-a/137709/">state legislatures have reduced funding</a> for public colleges and universities over that time, <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=3927">tuition bills have risen sharply</a> to compensate.</p>
<p><em>Drew DeSilver is a senior writer at the Pew Research Center.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most popular areas of government are shedding the most workers</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?post_type=fact-tank&#038;p=247107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popularity is no protection against budget cuts: The parts of government that Americans like the most &#8212; state, cities and counties, and the U.S. Postal Service &#8212; are also the ones shedding workers the fastest. The most recent nonfarm payroll figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the public sector continues to be a drag on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popularity is no protection against budget cuts: The parts of government that Americans like the most &#8212; state, cities and counties, and the U.S. Postal Service &#8212; are also the ones shedding workers the fastest.</p>
<p>The most recent nonfarm payroll <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">figures</a> from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the public sector continues to be a drag on overall employment. Governments at all levels have shed 835,300 jobs since public-sector employment peaked in April 2009 (not counting the spike in early 2010 caused by temporary Census workers). The private sector, meanwhile, has regained 6.78 million jobs since bottoming out in February 2010, and over the past year has averaged 180,500 new jobs a month.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-247048" alt="govjobs" src="http://www.pewresearch.org/files/2013/05/govjobs.png" width="421" height="293" />But the government-sector job cuts haven&#8217;t been spread evenly. In terms of sheer numbers, local schools have lost the most: 336,300 jobs over the past four years. Other local government cutbacks have eliminated 217,600 jobs; states (except for public colleges and universities) are down 160,300 jobs.<span id="more-247107"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/15/state-govermnents-viewed-favorably-as-federal-rating-hits-new-low/"><img class="alignright" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/04/4-15-13-1.png" width="296" height="330" /></a>In a Pew Research Center <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/15/state-govermnents-viewed-favorably-as-federal-rating-hits-new-low/">survey</a> conducted in March, 63% of people said they had a favorable opinion of their local government, a level that&#8217;s stayed fairly constant over several years; 57% expressed favorable views of their state government, a five-point uptick from last year. But  just 28% rated the federal government favorably, versus 65% unfavorably; the favorability rating was five points lower than a year earlier and the lowest ever in a Pew Research Center survey.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding the dim view most people take of the federal government, and despite the wide-ranging budget cuts known as &#8220;sequestration,&#8221; most of the federal payroll remains intact. Leaving aside one big exception, there were 20,000 fewer federal employees last month than there were four years earlier, a decline of less than 1%.</p>
<p>The exception is the long-suffering Postal Service, where employment is down by 132,300 jobs, or 18.3%, since April 2009. The Postal Service has been shedding workers for years, though the pace picked up during the recession; it accounts for 15.8% of all government job cuts since April 2009, even though it employed only 3.2% of the total government workforce.</p>
<p>Even so, the Postal Service is one of the better-regarded arms of the federal government. In a 2010 Pew Research <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2010/04/18/section-5-views-of-federal-departments-and-agencies/">survey</a>, 83% of people said they had a favorable opinion of the Postal Service, the highest level among the 13 agencies asked about. More recently, 60% of respondents in an NBC News/Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/wsjnbcpoll-02262013.pdf">poll</a> said they had &#8220;very&#8221; (28%) or &#8220;somewhat&#8221; (32%) positive feelings toward the Postal Service &#8212; more than President Obama, either major party, the Catholic Church or the NRA.</p>
<p>The one government sector that&#8217;s actually added jobs has been state education, which is up 31,200 jobs (or 1.3%) since April 2009. Although many <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/StudentsStates-Near-a/137709/">state legislatures have reduced funding</a> for public colleges and universities over that time, <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=3927">tuition bills have risen sharply</a> to compensate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/05/15/the-most-popular-areas-of-government-are-shedding-the-most-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Blame for Flight Delays Spread Evenly</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/04/29/political-blame-for-flight-delays-spread-evenly/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=political-blame-for-flight-delays-spread-evenly</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/04/29/political-blame-for-flight-delays-spread-evenly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=246236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Washington sprang into action late last week to end the furlough of federal air-traffic controllers and delays at airports across the country, the public blamed both sides for the situation.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[As Washington sprang into action late last week to end the furlough of federal air-traffic controllers and delays at airports across the country, the public blamed both sides for the situation.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/04/29/political-blame-for-flight-delays-spread-evenly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt and Deficit: Key Data Points from Pew Research</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/22/debt-and-deficit-key-data-points-from-pew-research/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=debt-and-deficit-key-data-points-from-pew-research</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/22/debt-and-deficit-key-data-points-from-pew-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fact Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=242972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public now is much more likely than four years ago to say that reducing the federal budget deficit should be a top priority in 2013 for President Obama and Congress.  When Barack Obama took office in early 2009, reducing the budget deficit was a middle-tier item on the public&#8217;s agenda. Only about half of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The public now is much more likely than four years ago to say that reducing the federal budget deficit should be a top priority in 2013 for President Obama and Congress. </strong></p>
<p>When Barack Obama took office in early 2009, reducing the budget deficit was a middle-tier item on the public&#8217;s agenda. Only about half of Americans (53%) viewed it as a top policy priority, placing it ninth on a list of 20 policy goals. But our <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/">survey conducted Jan. 9-13</a> found that, as Obama starts his second term, only the economy and jobs are viewed as more important priorities for the coming year.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.pewresearch.org/files/2013/02/PRC_Deficit_2013.png" width="310" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>Currently, 72% say that reducing the budget deficit should be a top priority, up 19 points from four years ago. The budget deficit has increased as a priority since 2009 among Democrats, independents and especially Republicans.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/">More than eight-in-ten (84%) Republicans say this is a top priority for 2013,</a> compared with 67% of Democrats and 71% of independents. Four years ago, 51% of Republicans, 52% of Democrats and 57% of independents said reducing the deficit was a top priority for the year ahead. (<i>See our interactive chart, “<a href="http://www.people-press.org/interactives/top-priorities/">Twelve Years of the Public’s Top Priorities</a>“).</i></p>
<p><strong>The public again put emphasis on the need to deal with the budget deficit, with 70% saying, in a <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/">February survey</a>, that it was essential for the White House and Congress to address it this year.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/"><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-21-13-2.png" width="294" height="217" /></a></p>
<p><strong>A <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/21/section-1-obama-job-approval-confidence-on-budget-deficit/#entitlements-priority">survey conducted in March</a> found the public continued to say that maintaining entitlement benefits was a greater priority than cutting the deficit.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/21/section-1-obama-job-approval-confidence-on-budget-deficit/#entitlements-priority"><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/03/3-21-13-9.png" width="296" height="246" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Our <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/22/as-sequester-deadline-looms-little-support-for-cutting-most-programs/">February survey</a> showed that majorities also disapproved of many of the most-talked-about deficit reduction proposals in other areas as well.    </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/22/as-sequester-deadline-looms-little-support-for-cutting-most-programs/"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-22-13-1.png" width="295" height="599" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Not surprisingly, partisans have markedly different views on many of the debt reduction ideas.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-22-13-2.png" width="290" height="853" /></p>
<p><strong>Still, most Americans see <a href="www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/#mixofmeasures">a need for a combination</a> of cutting major programs and increasing taxes to reduce the deficit.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/#mixofmeasures"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-21-13-4.png" width="413" height="374" /></a></p>
<p>There are <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/section-1-opinions-about-major-issues/#partisandebt">partisan differences</a> on the question of deficit-cutting strategy.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/section-1-opinions-about-major-issues/#partisandebt"><img style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-21-13-7.png" width="409" height="265" /></a></p>
<p><strong>In a survey <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/12/13/section-1-views-of-obama-congress-the-parties/#mostissues">last December</a>, the public gave Democrats an edge when it comes to which party can do a better job dealing with Medicare and Social Security, though the parties run nearly even on dealing with the deficit.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/12/13/section-1-views-of-obama-congress-the-parties/#mostissues"><img class="aligncenter" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2012/12/12-13-12-14.png" width="295" height="664" /></a></p>
<p><strong>While there has been little change in public views on government spending in the last two years,<a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/22/as-sequester-deadline-looms-little-support-for-cutting-most-programs/"> the long-term trend</a> over the past quarter-century is, for the most part, away from spending growth.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/02/22/as-sequester-deadline-looms-little-support-for-cutting-most-programs/"><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: bottom;" alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2013/02/2-22-13-4.png" width="411" height="742" /></a></p>
<p><em><strong>See also, &#8220;<a href="http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/12/20/the-big-generation-gap-at-the-polls-is-echoed-in-attitudes-on-budget-tradeoffs/">The Big Generation Gap at the Polls Is Echoed in Attitudes on Budget Tradeoffs</a>,&#8221; Dec. 20, 2012.</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Read more Pew Research reports on the <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/economic-policy/">Debt and Deficit</a>.</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Browse our  data point sheets on other issues: </strong></em></p>
<p><a name="economy-middle-class-gun-control-u-s-china-relations-immigration-climate-change-gay-marriage-deficit-foreign-policy"></a><a name="toc-anchor-243657-1"></a></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3><a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/08/state-of-the-union-2013-pew-research-tip-sheet/">Overview</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/07/economy-key-data-points-from-pew-research/" class="broken_link">Economy</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/08/the-middle-class-pew-research-key-data-points/">Middle Class</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/07/gun-control-key-data-points-from-pew-research/">Gun Control</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/07/u-s-china-relations-key-data-points-from-pew-research/">U.S.-China Relations</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/06/immigration-tip-sheet-on-u-s-public-opinion/">Immigration</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/07/climate-change-key-data-points-from-pew-research/">Climate Change</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/07/gay-marriage-key-data-points-from-pew-research/">Gay Marriage</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/08/u-s-middle-east-relations-key-data-points/">U.S.-Middle East Relations</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/08/u-s-foreign-policy-key-data-points/">Foreign Policy</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/26/iran-key-data-points/">Iran</a> | <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/25/u-s-catholics-key-data-from-pew-research/">U.S. Catholics</a></h3>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/22/debt-and-deficit-key-data-points-from-pew-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Budget Cuts Shrink the U.S. Global Role?</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/will-budget-cuts-isolationism/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-budget-cuts-isolationism</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/will-budget-cuts-isolationism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=244802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The forced budget cuts, known in Washington as sequestration, are now in force in the United States and $85 billion in spending cuts are in the process of being implemented, with about half of them coming out of Washington’s spending on international engagement.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The forced budget cuts, known in Washington as sequestration, are now in force in the United States and $85 billion in spending cuts are in the process of being implemented, with about half of them coming out of Washington’s spending on international engagement.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/will-budget-cuts-isolationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most See Major Impact From Spending Cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/25/most-say-spending-cuts-would-have-major-impact/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=most-say-spending-cuts-would-have-major-impact</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/25/most-say-spending-cuts-would-have-major-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=244537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public is fatigued after a series of fiscal crises. Only a quarter are following the issue very closely.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The public is fatigued after a series of fiscal crises. Only a quarter are following the issue very closely.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/25/most-say-spending-cuts-would-have-major-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little Public Support for Cutting Most Programs</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/22/little-public-support-for-cutting-most-programs/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=little-public-support-for-cutting-most-programs</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/22/little-public-support-for-cutting-most-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=244382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the March 1 deadline for a possible budget sequester approaches, a new national survey finds limited public support for reducing spending for a range of specific programs, including defense, entitlements, education and health care.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the March 1 deadline for a possible budget sequester approaches, a new national survey finds limited public support for reducing spending for a range of specific programs, including defense, entitlements, education and health care.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/22/little-public-support-for-cutting-most-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If No Deal is Struck, Four-in-Ten Say Let the Sequester Happen</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=244329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a series of fiscal crises over the past few years, the public is not expressing a particular sense of urgency over the pending March 1 sequester deadline.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[After a series of fiscal crises over the past few years, the public is not expressing a particular sense of urgency over the pending March 1 sequester deadline.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/21/if-no-deal-is-struck-four-in-ten-say-let-the-sequester-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deficit Reduction Rises on Public&#8217;s Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=242712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Barack Obama begins his second term, only the economy and jobs are viewed as more important priorities than deficit reduction for the coming year.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[As Barack Obama begins his second term, only the economy and jobs are viewed as more important priorities than deficit reduction for the coming year.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception</title>
		<link>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/07/obama-viewed-as-fiscal-cliff-victor-legislation-gets-lukewarm-reception/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-viewed-as-fiscal-cliff-victor-legislation-gets-lukewarm-reception</link>
		<comments>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/07/obama-viewed-as-fiscal-cliff-victor-legislation-gets-lukewarm-reception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pew Research Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pewresearch.org/?p=242296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama is viewed as the clear political winner in the fiscal cliff negotiations. But about as many Americans disapprove as approve of the new tax legislation.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Barack Obama is viewed as the clear political winner in the fiscal cliff negotiations. But about as many Americans disapprove as approve of the new tax legislation.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/01/07/obama-viewed-as-fiscal-cliff-victor-legislation-gets-lukewarm-reception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
